swipium
npm
v1.5.0
Source verified
Published by geropalombo — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −6.3 | Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 | injection |
2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 10 = 84. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −10 | capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/init.js:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { existsSync, readFileSync, appendFileSync, mkdirSync } from 'node:fs'; i
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/init.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/android.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { existsSync, readdirSync, statSync } from 'node:fs'; import { homedir }
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/lib/android.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/spawn.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { basename } from 'node:path'; /** Default kill timer for spawned command
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/lib/spawn.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/session/processRegistry.js:15`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { withFileLock } from '../lib/lockfile.js'; import { log } from '../lib/l
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/session/processRegistry.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/issues/reportBridge.js:26`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: st subsystem = detectSubsystem(`${f.detail} ${f.evidence ?? ''}`); return { title: `${f.kind}${f.screen ? `
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/issues/reportBridge.js
Tool "qa_get_artifact" takes a URL/host parameter "uri" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).
Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.
Location: tool qa_get_artifact · inputSchema.properties.uri
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/tools/metro.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { qaOk, qaError } from '../lib/result.js'; import { requireConsent, consu
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/tools/metro.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/tools/screenRecord.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { readFileSync, rmSync } from 'node:fs'; import { tmpdir } from 'node:os'
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/tools/screenRecord.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/tools/wda.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { existsSync, openSync, readFileSync, readdirSync, statSync } from 'node:
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/tools/wda.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
qa_agent_briefingests untrusted inputqa_app_map_readingests untrusted inputqa_capabilitiesingests untrusted inputqa_exploreingests untrusted inputqa_get_artifactingests untrusted inputqa_actno sensitive capabilityqa_app_controlno sensitive capabilityqa_app_map_buildno sensitive capabilityqa_app_map_feature_scopeno sensitive capabilityqa_app_map_queryno sensitive capabilityqa_app_map_updateno sensitive capabilityqa_assert_visualno sensitive capabilityqa_automation_validateno sensitive capabilityqa_buildno sensitive capabilityqa_bundletoolno sensitive capabilityqa_check_healthno sensitive capabilityqa_clear_overlayno sensitive capabilityqa_continue_from_blockerno sensitive capabilityqa_detect_contextno sensitive capabilityqa_device_infono sensitive capabilityqa_doctorno sensitive capabilityqa_explain_blockerno sensitive capabilityqa_first_runno sensitive capabilityqa_flow_checkno sensitive capabilityqa_flow_compileno sensitive capabilityqa_flow_repairno sensitive capabilityqa_flow_runno sensitive capabilityqa_generateno sensitive capabilityqa_geolocationno sensitive capabilityqa_inspectno sensitive capabilityqa_iosno sensitive capabilityqa_issue_logno sensitive capabilityqa_job_cancelno sensitive capabilityqa_job_statusno sensitive capabilityqa_locator_suggestno sensitive capabilityqa_metrono sensitive capabilityqa_mobile_auditno sensitive capabilityqa_networkno sensitive capabilityqa_next_best_actionno sensitive capabilityqa_noteno sensitive capabilityqa_orientationno sensitive capabilityqa_permissionsno sensitive capabilityqa_planno sensitive capabilityqa_prepare_ios_targetno sensitive capabilityqa_prepare_targetno sensitive capabilityqa_reportno sensitive capabilityqa_report_compareno sensitive capabilityqa_resolve_artifactno sensitive capabilityqa_resolve_targetno sensitive capabilityqa_run_historyno sensitive capabilityqa_screen_infono sensitive capabilityqa_screen_recordno sensitive capabilityqa_screenshotno sensitive capabilityqa_seedno sensitive capabilityqa_smokeno sensitive capabilityqa_snapshotno sensitive capabilityqa_start_sessionno sensitive capabilityqa_state_prepareno sensitive capabilityqa_state_teardownno sensitive capabilityqa_state_verifyno sensitive capabilityqa_statusno sensitive capabilityqa_suite_exportno sensitive capabilityqa_suite_generateno sensitive capabilityqa_suite_lintno sensitive capabilityqa_suite_readno sensitive capabilityqa_suite_updateno sensitive capabilityqa_test_featureno sensitive capabilityqa_test_thisno sensitive capabilityqa_visualno sensitive capabilityqa_visual_find_textno sensitive capabilityqa_waitno sensitive capabilityqa_wdano sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.5.0 latest |
B 84/100 | 9 | 1.8.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan swipium --online
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.