Swipium MCP Server

swipium npm v1.5.0 Source verified

Published by geropalombo — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Trust grade
B
84/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 84/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 84/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 10 = 84. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 9

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli/init.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/init.js:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { existsSync, readFileSync, appendFileSync, mkdirSync } from 'node:fs'; i

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/init.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/lib/android.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/android.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { existsSync, readdirSync, statSync } from 'node:fs'; import { homedir }

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/lib/android.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/lib/spawn.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/spawn.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { basename } from 'node:path'; /** Default kill timer for spawned command

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/lib/spawn.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/session/processRegistry.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/session/processRegistry.js:15`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { withFileLock } from '../lib/lockfile.js'; import { log } from '../lib/l

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/session/processRegistry.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/issues/reportBridge.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/issues/reportBridge.js:26`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: st subsystem = detectSubsystem(`${f.detail} ${f.evidence ?? ''}`); return { title: `${f.kind}${f.screen ? `

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/issues/reportBridge.js

medium Unconstrained URL/host parameter "uri" on "qa_get_artifact"MTC-CAP-007

Tool "qa_get_artifact" takes a URL/host parameter "uri" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).

Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.

Location: tool qa_get_artifact · inputSchema.properties.uri

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/tools/metro.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/tools/metro.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { qaOk, qaError } from '../lib/result.js'; import { requireConsent, consu

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/metro.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/tools/screenRecord.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/tools/screenRecord.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { readFileSync, rmSync } from 'node:fs'; import { tmpdir } from 'node:os'

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/screenRecord.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/tools/wda.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/tools/wda.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { existsSync, openSync, readFileSync, readdirSync, statSync } from 'node:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/wda.js

Tools 72

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • qa_agent_briefingests untrusted input
  • qa_app_map_readingests untrusted input
  • qa_capabilitiesingests untrusted input
  • qa_exploreingests untrusted input
  • qa_get_artifactingests untrusted input
  • qa_actno sensitive capability
  • qa_app_controlno sensitive capability
  • qa_app_map_buildno sensitive capability
  • qa_app_map_feature_scopeno sensitive capability
  • qa_app_map_queryno sensitive capability
Show 62 more tools ↓
  • qa_app_map_updateno sensitive capability
  • qa_assert_visualno sensitive capability
  • qa_automation_validateno sensitive capability
  • qa_buildno sensitive capability
  • qa_bundletoolno sensitive capability
  • qa_check_healthno sensitive capability
  • qa_clear_overlayno sensitive capability
  • qa_continue_from_blockerno sensitive capability
  • qa_detect_contextno sensitive capability
  • qa_device_infono sensitive capability
  • qa_doctorno sensitive capability
  • qa_explain_blockerno sensitive capability
  • qa_first_runno sensitive capability
  • qa_flow_checkno sensitive capability
  • qa_flow_compileno sensitive capability
  • qa_flow_repairno sensitive capability
  • qa_flow_runno sensitive capability
  • qa_generateno sensitive capability
  • qa_geolocationno sensitive capability
  • qa_inspectno sensitive capability
  • qa_iosno sensitive capability
  • qa_issue_logno sensitive capability
  • qa_job_cancelno sensitive capability
  • qa_job_statusno sensitive capability
  • qa_locator_suggestno sensitive capability
  • qa_metrono sensitive capability
  • qa_mobile_auditno sensitive capability
  • qa_networkno sensitive capability
  • qa_next_best_actionno sensitive capability
  • qa_noteno sensitive capability
  • qa_orientationno sensitive capability
  • qa_permissionsno sensitive capability
  • qa_planno sensitive capability
  • qa_prepare_ios_targetno sensitive capability
  • qa_prepare_targetno sensitive capability
  • qa_reportno sensitive capability
  • qa_report_compareno sensitive capability
  • qa_resolve_artifactno sensitive capability
  • qa_resolve_targetno sensitive capability
  • qa_run_historyno sensitive capability
  • qa_screen_infono sensitive capability
  • qa_screen_recordno sensitive capability
  • qa_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • qa_seedno sensitive capability
  • qa_smokeno sensitive capability
  • qa_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • qa_start_sessionno sensitive capability
  • qa_state_prepareno sensitive capability
  • qa_state_teardownno sensitive capability
  • qa_state_verifyno sensitive capability
  • qa_statusno sensitive capability
  • qa_suite_exportno sensitive capability
  • qa_suite_generateno sensitive capability
  • qa_suite_lintno sensitive capability
  • qa_suite_readno sensitive capability
  • qa_suite_updateno sensitive capability
  • qa_test_featureno sensitive capability
  • qa_test_thisno sensitive capability
  • qa_visualno sensitive capability
  • qa_visual_find_textno sensitive capability
  • qa_waitno sensitive capability
  • qa_wdano sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.5.0 latest B 84/100 9 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 84/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/swipium/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/swipium)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/swipium"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/swipium/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/swipium/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan swipium --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools