Specforge MCP Server

specforge-mcp npm v0.15.0

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Trust grade
B
83/100
Last scanned
Trust
B · 83/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
B Why this grade threat 91 − adoption risk = 83/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 9.5 = 91. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−9.5 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink ×2 MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 91 − 8 = 83. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 7

high Dynamic code execution in server code (dist/engine/auditor-security/electron-checks.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/auditor-security/electron-checks.js:76`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: suggestion: 'Remove all eval() calls. Use JSON.parse() or safer alternatives.', reference: 'Electron Sec

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/auditor-security/electron-checks.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/engine/actuals/git-analyzer.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/actuals/git-analyzer.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from 'node:child_process'; const SPEC_ID_PATTERN = /^SPEC-\d+/; const MAX_SESSION_GAP_MS = 2 * 60 * 60 * 10

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/actuals/git-analyzer.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/engine/dora-metrics/git-log.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/dora-metrics/git-log.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFile } from 'node:child_process'; import { promisify } from 'node:util'; const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile)

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/dora-metrics/git-log.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/engine/workflow-validator/git-flow.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/workflow-validator/git-flow.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from 'node:child_process'; // === Helpers === function runGit(args, cwd) { try { return execSyn

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/workflow-validator/git-flow.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/engine/actuals/git-analyzer.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/actuals/git-analyzer.js:158`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const result = execSync(`git log --format="%H|%aI|%s" --numstat --all --grep="${specId}"`, { cwd: p

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/actuals/git-analyzer.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/engine/workflow-validator/git-flow.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/workflow-validator/git-flow.js:7`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try { return execSync(`git ${args}`, { cwd, encoding: 'utf-8', stdio: ['p

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/workflow-validator/git-flow.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/tools/git/git-helpers.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/tools/git/git-helpers.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: execFileCb } from 'node:child_process'; import { promisify } from 'node:util'; import { knowledgeStore } from '../../sto

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/git/git-helpers.js

Tools 32

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • auditno sensitive capability
  • challenge_specno sensitive capability
  • check_config_healthno sensitive capability
  • check_versionsno sensitive capability
  • clarify_requirementsno sensitive capability
  • consult_docsno sensitive capability
  • create_specno sensitive capability
  • define_ui_contractno sensitive capability
  • design_schemano sensitive capability
  • detect_agentno sensitive capability
Show 22 more tools ↓
  • detect_driftno sensitive capability
  • discover_mcpsno sensitive capability
  • estimateno sensitive capability
  • generate_adrno sensitive capability
  • generate_checklistno sensitive capability
  • generate_execution_planno sensitive capability
  • generate_orchestration_scriptno sensitive capability
  • generate_rulesno sensitive capability
  • generate_skillno sensitive capability
  • generate_sub_agentno sensitive capability
  • init_constitutionno sensitive capability
  • init_projectno sensitive capability
  • learn_patternno sensitive capability
  • list_specsno sensitive capability
  • reconcile_specno sensitive capability
  • reverse_engineerno sensitive capability
  • set_localeno sensitive capability
  • suggest_mcpsno sensitive capability
  • suggest_stackno sensitive capability
  • summarize_specno sensitive capability
  • update_statusno sensitive capability
  • validateno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.15.0 latest B 83/100 7 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 83/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/specforge-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/specforge-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/specforge-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/specforge-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/specforge-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan specforge-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools