Socraticode MCP Server

socraticode npm v1.13.0

Published by giancarloerra — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

SocratiCode — MCP server for local codebase indexing, semantic search, and code dependency graphs. All private, all local via Docker.

Trust grade
B
87/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 87/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 87/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 7 = 87. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/config.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/config.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ecFileSync } from "node:child_process"; import { createHash } from "node:crypto"; import fs from "node:fs"; import path

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/config.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/services/code-graph.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/services/code-graph.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ecFileSync } from "node:child_process"; import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; import fs from "node:fs/promises"; imp

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/services/code-graph.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/services/docker.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/services/docker.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; import { OLLAMA_CONTAINER_NAME, OLLAMA_HO

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/services/docker.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/services/lock.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/services/lock.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from "node:child_process"; import fs from "node:fs"; import os from "node:os"; import path from "node:path"

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/services/lock.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/services/lock.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/services/lock.js:199`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ble option. execSync(`taskkill /F /PID ${pid}`, { stdio: "ignore" }); logger.info("Sent taskkill

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/services/lock.js

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (dist/services/gdscript-preflight.cjs)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`dist/services/gdscript-preflight.cjs:61`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try { nativeModule = require(nativePath); } catch (err) { console.error("PREFLIGHT: require() of native addon faile

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/services/gdscript-preflight.cjs

Tools 25

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • codebase_aboutno sensitive capability
  • codebase_contextno sensitive capability
  • codebase_context_indexno sensitive capability
  • codebase_context_removeno sensitive capability
  • codebase_context_searchno sensitive capability
  • codebase_flowno sensitive capability
  • codebase_graph_buildno sensitive capability
  • codebase_graph_circularno sensitive capability
  • codebase_graph_queryno sensitive capability
  • codebase_graph_removeno sensitive capability
Show 15 more tools ↓
  • codebase_graph_statsno sensitive capability
  • codebase_graph_statusno sensitive capability
  • codebase_graph_visualizeno sensitive capability
  • codebase_healthno sensitive capability
  • codebase_impactno sensitive capability
  • codebase_indexno sensitive capability
  • codebase_list_projectsno sensitive capability
  • codebase_removeno sensitive capability
  • codebase_searchno sensitive capability
  • codebase_statusno sensitive capability
  • codebase_stopno sensitive capability
  • codebase_symbolno sensitive capability
  • codebase_symbolsno sensitive capability
  • codebase_updateno sensitive capability
  • codebase_watchno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 7

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.13.0 latest B 87/100 6 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v1.12.0 B 87/100 4 1.13.0 2026-09-06
v1.11.0 B 87/100 4 1.12.1 2026-08-14
v1.10.0 B 87/100 4 1.12.1 2026-08-05
v1.9.2 B 87/100 4 1.12.1 2026-07-29
Show 2 more versions ↓
v1.9.1 B 87/100 4 1.12.1 2026-07-28
v1.9.0 B 87/100 4 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 87/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/socraticode/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/socraticode)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/socraticode"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/socraticode/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/socraticode/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan socraticode --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Web, Search & Scraping