smooth-ssh-mcp
npm
v0.1.7
Published by da-bai-da — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
MCP server for safer, structured OpenSSH operations by AI assistants.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/init.js:9`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: identityFile: ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 environment: dev tags: [example] capabilities: sudo: true sys
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/init.js
Tool "ssh_exec" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name, parameter "command"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool ssh_exec
In the server's implementation (`dist/forwardManager.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; import { wrapWithPasswordAuth } from "
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/forwardManager.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/runner.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; export const nodeRunner = { run(file, args, options = {}) { return r
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/runner.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/sessionManager.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; import { wrapWithPasswordAuth } from "
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/sessionManager.js
Untrusted-input tools ([file_download]) co-exist with external-action tools ([ssh_exec]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [file_download] → sinks [ssh_exec]
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow file_download → ssh_exec
Tool "ssh_exec" takes a command-shaped parameter "command" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.
Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.
Location: tool ssh_exec · inputSchema.properties.command
Tool "ssh_exec" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool ssh_exec
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
file_downloadingests untrusted inputssh_execruns code / shellcapability_listno sensitive capabilitycleanup_pathsno sensitive capabilityfile_uploadno sensitive capabilityforward_listno sensitive capabilityforward_startno sensitive capabilityforward_stopno sensitive capabilityhost_addno sensitive capabilityhost_connectno sensitive capabilityhost_getno sensitive capabilityhost_healthno sensitive capabilityhost_listno sensitive capabilityhost_permission_setno sensitive capabilityhost_recentno sensitive capabilityhost_removeno sensitive capabilityhost_selectno sensitive capabilityhost_updateno sensitive capabilitysecret_setno sensitive capabilitysession_listno sensitive capabilitysession_readno sensitive capabilitysession_sendno sensitive capabilitysession_startno sensitive capabilitysession_stopno sensitive capabilityssh_commandno sensitive capabilityssh_probeno sensitive capabilitytask_batchno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.7 latest |
A 93/100 | 8 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-29 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan smooth-ssh-mcp --online
Safe bulk Meta ads: launch 150+ campaigns from Drive folders with spend guardrails and validation.
CLI tool to add MCP servers to various AI coding clients
MCP compatibility adapter for Agent Tool Protocol
MCP server for multi-tenant DuckDB management with R2/S3 storage
A stdio-to-HTTP MCP proxy that transparently intercepts file parameters, reading local files and base64-encoding them before forwarding to the remote server.
Free buyer-side outcome verification and provider comparison for supplied agent receipts.