Slurm (Charlie-Z-work) MCP Server

slurm-mcp-server npm v2.0.1

Published by charlie-z-work — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for SLURM HPC clusters — 25+ tools, multi-cluster, job templates, auto-reconnect, webhook notifications

Trust grade
B
87/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 87/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 87/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 7 = 87. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 9

high Sensitive-source and external-sink co-existMTC-FLOW-004

Tools that read sensitive data ([ssh_read_file]) and tools that can send data out ([ssh_exec, terminal_exec]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.

Evidence: sources [ssh_read_file] → sinks [ssh_exec, terminal_exec]

Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.

Location: flow ssh_read_file → ssh_exec

high Tool "ssh_exec" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "ssh_exec" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool ssh_exec

high Tool "terminal_exec" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "terminal_exec" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool terminal_exec

high Shell/command execution in server code (index.mjs)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`index.mjs:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: e as execFileCb } from 'child_process'; import { readFileSync, writeFileSync, mkdirSync, existsSync } from 'fs'; import

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server index.mjs

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (index.mjs)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`index.mjs:38`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ess.ppid; const raw = execSync(`ps -p ${ppid} -o tty=`, { encoding: 'utf-8' }).trim(); windowTty = (!raw || raw ===

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server index.mjs

medium Tool "ssh_write_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "ssh_write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool ssh_write_file

low Mutating tool "ssh_exec" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "ssh_exec" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool ssh_exec

low Mutating tool "ssh_write_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "ssh_write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool ssh_write_file

low Mutating tool "terminal_exec" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "terminal_exec" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool terminal_exec

Tools 26

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • ssh_execruns code / shell
  • ssh_read_filereads sensitive data
  • ssh_write_filewrites files
  • terminal_execruns code / shell
  • cluster_infono sensitive capability
  • cluster_switchno sensitive capability
  • guideno sensitive capability
  • resource_checkno sensitive capability
  • resource_reportno sensitive capability
  • slurm_cancelno sensitive capability
Show 16 more tools ↓
  • slurm_logsno sensitive capability
  • slurm_statusno sensitive capability
  • slurm_submitno sensitive capability
  • slurm_submit_fileno sensitive capability
  • slurm_watchesno sensitive capability
  • ssh_interactiveno sensitive capability
  • ssh_statusno sensitive capability
  • sync_filesno sensitive capability
  • template_listno sensitive capability
  • template_saveno sensitive capability
  • terminal_readno sensitive capability
  • terminal_sendno sensitive capability
  • terminal_startno sensitive capability
  • terminal_stopno sensitive capability
  • workdir_getno sensitive capability
  • workdir_setno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.0.1 latest B 87/100 9 1.12.1 2026-07-29

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 87/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/slurm-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/slurm-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/slurm-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/slurm-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/slurm-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan slurm-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Slurm 2

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 3 side by side →

More in Developer Tools