Sitezen MCP Server

sitezen-mcp npm v1.20.3

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

SiteZen MCP server — lets Claude Desktop (or any MCP client) drive a SiteZen-enabled WordPress site directly. The end user's Claude subscription pays for LLM tokens; the conversion rules + license are served from the SiteZen platform.

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 3

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/converge.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/converge.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt{spawn as J}from"node:child_process";import _ from"node:net";import N from"node:crypto";import b from"node:fs";import

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/converge.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/figma.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/figma.js:1`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: {...u}]}}}const c=await fetch(`https://api.figma.com/v1/files/${i}${o==="shallow"?"?depth=3":""}`,{headers:{"X-Figma-Tok

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/figma.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/tools.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools.js:11`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ale=1":"",T=await(await fetch(`https://api.figma.com/v1/images/${u.fileKey}?ids=${x[l].join(",")}&format=${l}${E}`,{head

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools.js

Tools 43

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_page_htmlingests untrusted input
  • list_pagesingests untrusted input
  • push_section_to_pageingests untrusted input
  • assemble_sectionno sensitive capability
  • check_configno sensitive capability
  • connect_siteno sensitive capability
  • create_filter_datano sensitive capability
  • create_header_footerno sensitive capability
  • create_pageno sensitive capability
  • create_productsno sensitive capability
Show 33 more tools ↓
  • create_templateno sensitive capability
  • delete_sectionno sensitive capability
  • detect_section_kindno sensitive capability
  • disconnect_siteno sensitive capability
  • editor_v2_capabilitiesno sensitive capability
  • elementor_create_menuno sensitive capability
  • elementor_create_postsno sensitive capability
  • elementor_get_rulesno sensitive capability
  • elementor_pushno sensitive capability
  • elementor_readno sensitive capability
  • elementor_sideload_mediano sensitive capability
  • elementor_start_conversionno sensitive capability
  • elementor_verifyno sensitive capability
  • get_conversion_rulesno sensitive capability
  • get_license_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_rendered_previewno sensitive capability
  • get_site_globalsno sensitive capability
  • get_site_widthsno sensitive capability
  • get_wc_single_templateno sensitive capability
  • list_connected_sitesno sensitive capability
  • list_section_rendersno sensitive capability
  • list_sectionsno sensitive capability
  • list_templatesno sensitive capability
  • prepare_sectionno sensitive capability
  • replace_sectionno sensitive capability
  • report_copy_attemptno sensitive capability
  • restore_sectionno sensitive capability
  • set_page_roleno sensitive capability
  • set_site_brandingno sensitive capability
  • set_wc_single_product_templateno sensitive capability
  • start_conversionno sensitive capability
  • start_fix_loopno sensitive capability
  • start_html_importno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 6

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.20.3 latest A 92/100 3 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v1.20.2 A 92/100 3 1.13.0 2026-08-28
v1.20.0 A 92/100 3 1.12.1 2026-08-16
v1.19.0 A 92/100 3 1.12.1 2026-08-13
v1.17.1 A 92/100 3 1.12.1 2026-08-12
Show 1 more version ↓
v1.14.10 A 92/100 3 1.12.1 2026-08-10

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sitezen-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sitezen-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sitezen-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sitezen-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sitezen-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan sitezen-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Content Management