Simplr Ai Dev MCP Server

@simplr-ai/dev-mcp npm v1.4.4

Published by @simplr-ai — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Simplr Dev MCP - help AI coding agents integrate every Simplr feature (guides, snippets, live verification)

Trust grade
A
95/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 95/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 95/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([list_flags]) co-exist with external-action tools ([create_webhook]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [list_flags] → sinks [create_webhook]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow list_flags → create_webhook

medium Unconstrained URL/host parameter "url" on "create_webhook"MTC-CAP-007

Tool "create_webhook" takes a URL/host parameter "url" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).

Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.

Location: tool create_webhook · inputSchema.properties.url

Tools 50

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • create_webhooknetwork egress
  • list_flagsingests untrusted input
  • apply_automation_setupno sensitive capability
  • assess_performance_and_experienceno sensitive capability
  • attach_test_evidenceno sensitive capability
  • claim_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • claim_self_healing_incidentno sensitive capability
  • code_review_setup_guideno sensitive capability
  • comment_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • complete_test_verificationno sensitive capability
Show 40 more tools ↓
  • configure_environment_mappingno sensitive capability
  • configure_github_automation_policyno sensitive capability
  • connect_google_cloud_loggingno sensitive capability
  • connect_incident_ai_providerno sensitive capability
  • connect_mongodb_investigationno sensitive capability
  • create_feature_flagno sensitive capability
  • create_test_verificationno sensitive capability
  • evaluate_self_healing_actionno sensitive capability
  • execute_github_operationno sensitive capability
  • get_agent_coding_standardsno sensitive capability
  • get_api_referenceno sensitive capability
  • get_automation_setup_planno sensitive capability
  • get_code_snippetno sensitive capability
  • get_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • get_incident_escalation_contextno sensitive capability
  • get_integration_guideno sensitive capability
  • get_quickstartno sensitive capability
  • get_self_healing_incidentno sensitive capability
  • inspect_automation_setupno sensitive capability
  • inspect_github_automationno sensitive capability
  • investigate_self_healing_incidentno sensitive capability
  • lease_test_credentialno sensitive capability
  • list_featuresno sensitive capability
  • list_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • list_self_healing_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • load_code_review_standardno sensitive capability
  • release_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • report_agent_standard_outcomeno sensitive capability
  • request_ai_code_reviewno sensitive capability
  • request_github_operationno sensitive capability
  • run_automation_templateno sensitive capability
  • run_checkno sensitive capability
  • search_docsno sensitive capability
  • send_automation_test_eventno sensitive capability
  • start_test_verificationno sensitive capability
  • submit_review_fix_learningno sensitive capability
  • test_incident_connectionno sensitive capability
  • update_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • update_self_healing_incidentno sensitive capability
  • validate_api_keyno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 5

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.4.4 latest A 95/100 2 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v1.4.3 A 95/100 2 1.12.1 2026-08-05
v1.4.2 A 95/100 2 1.12.1 2026-08-03
v1.4.1 A 95/100 2 1.12.1 2026-08-01
v1.2.0 A 95/100 2 1.12.1 2026-07-28

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 95/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simplr-ai-dev-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simplr-ai-dev-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simplr-ai-dev-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simplr-ai-dev-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simplr-ai-dev-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @simplr-ai/dev-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Learning & Documentation