Simctl (npm) MCP Server

simctl-mcp npm v0.0.3

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

simctl mcp server

Trust grade
B
86/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 86/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 91 − adoption risk = 86/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 9.5 = 91. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−9.5 Description names a credential store the tool cannot reach ×2 MTC-INJ-SCHEMA-1 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 91 − 5 = 86. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

medium Description names a credential store the tool cannot reachMTC-INJ-SCHEMA-1

Tool "add_root_certificate" describes a credential store (SSH keys, cloud credentials, a keychain or an equivalent) that nothing in its input schema can address. A tool's interface is the honest statement of what it touches; prose that reaches past it is addressed to the model, not to a reader.

Evidence: keychain

Fix: Remove the reference, or expose the target as an explicit, validated parameter so the client can see and consent to what the tool reads.

Location: tool add_root_certificate · description

medium Description names a credential store the tool cannot reachMTC-INJ-SCHEMA-1

Tool "add_certificate" describes a credential store (SSH keys, cloud credentials, a keychain or an equivalent) that nothing in its input schema can address. A tool's interface is the honest statement of what it touches; prose that reaches past it is addressed to the model, not to a reader.

Evidence: keychain

Fix: Remove the reference, or expose the target as an explicit, validated parameter so the client can see and consent to what the tool reads.

Location: tool add_certificate · description

Tools 29

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_envreads sensitive data
  • add_certificateno sensitive capability
  • add_mediano sensitive capability
  • add_root_certificateno sensitive capability
  • boot_deviceno sensitive capability
  • create_deviceno sensitive capability
  • delete_deviceno sensitive capability
  • get_app_containerno sensitive capability
  • get_app_infono sensitive capability
  • get_appearanceno sensitive capability
Show 19 more tools ↓
  • get_pasteboardno sensitive capability
  • get_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • grant_permissionno sensitive capability
  • install_appno sensitive capability
  • launch_appno sensitive capability
  • list_appsno sensitive capability
  • list_device_typesno sensitive capability
  • list_devicesno sensitive capability
  • list_runtimesno sensitive capability
  • open_urlno sensitive capability
  • push_notificationno sensitive capability
  • reset_keychainno sensitive capability
  • reset_permissionno sensitive capability
  • revoke_permissionno sensitive capability
  • set_appearanceno sensitive capability
  • set_pasteboardno sensitive capability
  • shutdown_deviceno sensitive capability
  • terminate_appno sensitive capability
  • uninstall_appno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.0.3 latest B 86/100 2 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 86/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simctl-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simctl-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simctl-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simctl-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/simctl-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan simctl-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Simctl 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Other