Slack (Sigma Computing) (sigmacomputing) MCP Server

@sigmacomputing/slack-mcp-server npm v0.1.1 Source verified

Published by sigmacomputing — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

MCP server for interacting with Slack.

Trust grade
A
94/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 94/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 94/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: slack_download_file → slack_list_files ⇒ slack_post_message. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink — and at least one leg is a direct schema wire (⇒), where a producer's output drops straight into a free-text parameter of the next tool, so the chain needs little agent cooperation. Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow slack_download_file → slack_list_files → slack_post_message

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/index.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:32`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch(`https://slack.com/api/conversations.list?${params}`, { headers: this.botHeaders });

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/index.js

Tools 17

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • slack_download_fileingests untrusted input
  • slack_list_filesreads sensitive data
  • slack_post_messagenetwork egress
  • slack_add_reactionno sensitive capability
  • slack_get_channel_historyno sensitive capability
  • slack_get_reactionsno sensitive capability
  • slack_get_thread_repliesno sensitive capability
  • slack_get_user_profileno sensitive capability
  • slack_get_usersno sensitive capability
  • slack_join_channelno sensitive capability
Show 7 more tools ↓
  • slack_list_bookmarksno sensitive capability
  • slack_list_channelsno sensitive capability
  • slack_list_pinsno sensitive capability
  • slack_remove_reactionno sensitive capability
  • slack_reply_to_threadno sensitive capability
  • slack_search_filesno sensitive capability
  • slack_search_messagesno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.1 latest A 94/100 2 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 94/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sigmacomputing-slack-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sigmacomputing-slack-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sigmacomputing-slack-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sigmacomputing-slack-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/sigmacomputing-slack-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @sigmacomputing/slack-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Slack (Sigma Computing) 29

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 30 side by side →

More in Productivity & Workflow