Scitex Cloud MCP Server
scitex-cloud
PyPI
v0.17.0
Published by ywatanabe1989 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 11 = 89. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −10 | capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
| ✓ | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 15
critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002
This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: cloud_sdk_files_download → api_project_list_files → onsite_eval_js. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.
Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.
Location: flow cloud_sdk_files_download → api_project_list_files → onsite_eval_js
high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (src/scitex_cloud/_cli/ssh.py)MTC-SRC-006
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_cli/ssh.py:117`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ~/.ssh
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_cli/ssh.py
high Tool "onsite_eval_js" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001
Tool "onsite_eval_js" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "eval"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool onsite_eval_js
high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_validate.py)MTC-SRC-001
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_validate.py:24`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: eval(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_validate.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_collab.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_collab.py:102`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.run(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_collab.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_repo.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_repo.py:23`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.run(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_repo.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_utils.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_utils.py:92`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.run(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_gitea_utils.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_workspace_cmds.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_workspace_cmds.py:31`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.run(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_cli/_workspace_cmds.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/_cli/ssh.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_cli/ssh.py:134`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.call(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_cli/ssh.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/_mcp_tools/gitea.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_mcp_tools/gitea.py:27`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.run(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_mcp_tools/gitea.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/_utils/_docker.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/_utils/_docker.py:48`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.run(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/_utils/_docker.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_deps.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_deps.py:123`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: subprocess.run(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_deps.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_scaffold_react.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_scaffold_react.py:38`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: child_process
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_scaffold_react.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_validate.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_validate.py:25`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: exec(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scitex_cloud/appmaker/_validate.py
low Mutating tool "onsite_eval_js" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005
Tool "onsite_eval_js" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool onsite_eval_js
Tools 50
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
api_project_list_filesreads sensitive datacloud_sdk_files_downloadingests untrusted inputcloud_sdk_files_listreads sensitive dataonsite_eval_jsruns code / shellapi_crossref_by_doino sensitive capabilityapi_crossref_searchno sensitive capabilityapi_enrich_bibtexno sensitive capabilityapi_project_commitno sensitive capabilityapi_scholar_searchno sensitive capabilityapi_statusno sensitive capabilityapi_writer_compileno sensitive capabilityapi_writer_list_sectionsno sensitive capabilityapp_check_depsno sensitive capabilityapp_get_currentno sensitive capabilityapp_get_infono sensitive capabilityapp_get_prefsno sensitive capabilityapp_list_allno sensitive capabilityapp_set_prefsno sensitive capabilityapp_switch_tono sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_data_createno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_data_deleteno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_data_getno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_data_listno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_data_searchno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_data_updateno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_files_deleteno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_files_uploadno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_jobs_cancelno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_jobs_listno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_jobs_statusno sensitive capabilitycloud_sdk_jobs_submitno sensitive capabilityonsite_capture_pageno sensitive capabilityonsite_check_permissionno sensitive capabilityonsite_get_contextno sensitive capabilityonsite_get_dev_app_urlno sensitive capabilityonsite_ui_actionno sensitive capabilityrepo_cloneno sensitive capabilityrepo_createno sensitive capabilityrepo_deleteno sensitive capabilityrepo_forkno sensitive capabilityrepo_issue_createno sensitive capabilityrepo_issue_listno sensitive capabilityrepo_listno sensitive capabilityrepo_loginno sensitive capabilityrepo_pr_createno sensitive capabilityrepo_pr_listno sensitive capabilityrepo_pullno sensitive capabilityrepo_pushno sensitive capabilityrepo_searchno sensitive capabilityrepo_statusno sensitive capability
Toxic flows 1
Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (50 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.17.0 latest |
B 89/100 | 15 | 1.8.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan scitex-cloud --online --registry pypiMore in Learning & Documentation
Security scan results for the Agentmail MCP server.
Security scan results for the Alfahq MCP server.
Security scan results for the Alpine MCP server.
Security scan results for the Atag MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aurais Mcp Research Reader MCP server.
Security scan results for the Bookstack MCP server.