Jira (rui.branco) MCP Server

@rui.branco/jira-mcp npm v1.7.11 Source verified

Published by rui-branco — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Jira & Confluence MCP server for any MCP-compatible AI client (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Cursor, etc.) - fetch tickets, search with JQL, update tickets, manage comments, change status, get Figma designs. Optional per-tool scopes, dry-run, audit log

Trust grade
B
84/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 84/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 84/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 10 = 84. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

high Shell/command execution in server code (index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`index.js:21`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: , execSync } = require("child_process"); // Auto-update: check GitHub for new commits, install in background const GITH

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server index.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([jira_get_ticket, confluence_get_page_children, confluence_get_page, confluence_download_attachment]) co-exist with external-action tools ([jira-mcp]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [jira_get_ticket, confluence_get_page_children, confluence_get_page, confluence_download_attachment] → sinks [jira-mcp]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow jira_get_ticket → jira-mcp

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (index.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`index.js:30`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ""; const remoteSha = execSync( `git ls-remote https://github.com/${GITHUB_REPO}.git HEAD`, { stdio: "pipe", t

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server index.js

medium Tool "jira_unlink_tickets" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "jira_unlink_tickets" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "unlink" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool jira_unlink_tickets

low Mutating tool "jira_unlink_tickets" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "jira_unlink_tickets" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool jira_unlink_tickets

Tools 59

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • confluence_download_attachmentingests untrusted input
  • confluence_get_pageingests untrusted input
  • confluence_get_page_childreningests untrusted input
  • jira_get_ticketingests untrusted input
  • jira_unlink_ticketswrites files
  • jira-mcpnetwork egress
  • confluence_add_commentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_add_labelno sensitive capability
  • confluence_create_pageno sensitive capability
  • confluence_create_spaceno sensitive capability
Show 49 more tools ↓
  • confluence_delete_pageno sensitive capability
  • confluence_delete_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_enableno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_commentsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_labelsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_recent_pagesno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_space_root_pagesno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_spacesno sensitive capability
  • confluence_list_attachmentsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_remove_labelno sensitive capability
  • confluence_searchno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_pageno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_upload_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_commentno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_instanceno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_watcherno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_worklogno sensitive capability
  • jira_clone_ticketno sensitive capability
  • jira_create_subtaskno sensitive capability
  • jira_create_ticketno sensitive capability
  • jira_delete_commentno sensitive capability
  • jira_delete_ticketno sensitive capability
  • jira_edit_commentno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_boardsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_changelogno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_componentsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_issue_typesno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_link_typesno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_myselfno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_prioritiesno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_sprintsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_teamsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_transitionsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_versionsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_worklogsno sensitive capability
  • jira_link_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • jira_list_instancesno sensitive capability
  • jira_move_to_sprintno sensitive capability
  • jira_remove_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • jira_remove_instanceno sensitive capability
  • jira_remove_watcherno sensitive capability
  • jira_reply_commentno sensitive capability
  • jira_searchno sensitive capability
  • jira_search_usersno sensitive capability
  • jira_transitionno sensitive capability
  • jira_update_ticketno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 4

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.7.11 latest B 84/100 5 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v1.7.9 B 84/100 5 1.13.0 2026-09-01
v1.7.8 B 84/100 5 1.13.0 2026-08-31
v1.7.7 B 83/100 5 1.12.1 2026-08-19

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 84/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rui-branco-jira-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rui-branco-jira-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rui-branco-jira-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rui-branco-jira-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rui-branco-jira-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @rui.branco/jira-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Jira 44

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 45 side by side →

More in Design & Media