Jira (rokealvo) MCP Server
@rokealvo/jira-mcp
npm
v1.4.0
Published by @rokealvo — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
JIRA MCP Server
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 1
medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005
Untrusted-input tools ([get_field_options, get_attachment, search_test_cases]) co-exist with external-action tools ([create_issue]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [get_field_options, get_attachment, search_test_cases] → sinks [create_issue]
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow get_field_options → create_issue
Tools 21
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
create_issuenetwork egressget_attachmentingests untrusted inputget_field_optionsingests untrusted inputsearch_test_casesingests untrusted inputadd_attachmentno sensitive capabilityadd_commentno sensitive capabilitydelete_issueno sensitive capabilityget_create_metano sensitive capabilityget_current_mcp_versionno sensitive capabilityget_epic_childrenno sensitive capability
Show 11 more tools ↓
get_issueno sensitive capabilityget_projectsno sensitive capabilityget_server_infono sensitive capabilityget_test_caseno sensitive capabilityget_test_runno sensitive capabilityget_transitionsno sensitive capabilityget_usersno sensitive capabilitysearch_issuesno sensitive capabilitysearch_test_runsno sensitive capabilitytransition_issueno sensitive capabilityupdate_issueno sensitive capability
Toxic flows 1
Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (21 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.4.0 latest |
A 95/100 | 1 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @rokealvo/jira-mcp --onlineOther implementations of Jira 44
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 45 side by side →
Community-maintained MCP server for Atlassian Jira Data Center. Not affiliated with Atlassian.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Jira Cloud API v3 with automatic Markdown-to-ADF conversion
MCP server for managing Jira Stories, sprints and boards in a self-hosted Jira instance (PRD automation workflow)
MCP server for Jira API integration - supports Jira Cloud
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for Jira integration with issue management, board operations, time tracking, and project management capabilities
Jira MCP Server
More in Business & CRM
Free public tax reference data — GST/VAT, income, company and capital-gains tax rules for 50+ countries.
The approval gate for unattended UCP buying agents — a policy/approval MCP proxy in front of a merchant's UCP checkout endpoint.
Autotask PSA MCP server. Generic entity query/get/create/update across the full REST API plus convenience tools for tickets, companies, contacts, projects, tasks and time entries. AI-safe with readonly mode and destructive-action confirmation. stdio + opt
MCP server for B2C Commerce developer experience tools
Search, compare and contact real-world companies through a public MCP business directory.
Norwegian business register (Brønnøysundregistrene) as an MCP server — companies, roles, subunits and annual accounts, with the register's silent traps encoded as guards.