resend-mcp-server
npm
v2.0.1
Published by 199-biotechnologies — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
Complete MCP server for Resend API with all endpoints - send emails, manage domains, contacts, broadcasts, and more
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`build/index.js:709`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: eData) || await fetch(`https://api.resend.com/broadcasts/${broadcastId}`, { method: 'PATCH',
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server build/index.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
send-emailnetwork egresscancel-emailno sensitive capabilitycreate-api-keyno sensitive capabilitycreate-audienceno sensitive capabilitycreate-broadcastno sensitive capabilitycreate-contactno sensitive capabilitycreate-domainno sensitive capabilitydelete-api-keyno sensitive capabilitydelete-audienceno sensitive capabilitydelete-broadcastno sensitive capabilitydelete-contactno sensitive capabilitydelete-domainno sensitive capabilityget-audienceno sensitive capabilityget-broadcastno sensitive capabilityget-contactno sensitive capabilityget-domainno sensitive capabilityget-emailno sensitive capabilitylist-api-keysno sensitive capabilitylist-audiencesno sensitive capabilitylist-broadcastsno sensitive capabilitylist-contactsno sensitive capabilitylist-domainsno sensitive capabilitysend-batch-emailsno sensitive capabilitysend-broadcastno sensitive capabilityupdate-broadcastno sensitive capabilityupdate-contactno sensitive capabilityupdate-domainno sensitive capabilityupdate-emailno sensitive capabilityverify-domainno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v2.0.1 latest |
A 96/100 | 1 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan resend-mcp-server --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 7 side by side →
Comprehensive MCP Server for Resend API - manage emails, domains, templates, contacts, and more via AI assistants
这是一个基于 [FastMCP](https://github.com/fastmcp/fastmcp) 框架构建的 MCP (Model Context Protocol) 工具包。
[](https://smithery.ai/server/@resend/resend-mcp) [](https://www.npmjs.com/package/resend-mcp)
MCP server for Resend — transactional email sending, contact management, and domain verification for Claude, Cursor, and AI agents
MCP server for Resend email API - send emails, manage contacts, audiences, and domains
An MCP server for sending emails via Resend API with stdio transport
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.