Qtpilot MCP Server
qtpilot
PyPI
v0.1.5
Published by ssss2art — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 1 = 99. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 58
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
chr_clickno sensitive capabilitychr_findno sensitive capabilitychr_formInputno sensitive capabilitychr_getPageTextno sensitive capabilitychr_navigateno sensitive capabilitychr_readConsoleMessagesno sensitive capabilitychr_readPageno sensitive capabilitychr_tabsContextno sensitive capabilitycu_cursorPositionno sensitive capabilitycu_doubleClickno sensitive capability
Show 48 more tools ↓
cu_keyno sensitive capabilitycu_leftClickno sensitive capabilitycu_middleClickno sensitive capabilitycu_mouseDownno sensitive capabilitycu_mouseDragno sensitive capabilitycu_mouseMoveno sensitive capabilitycu_mouseUpno sensitive capabilitycu_rightClickno sensitive capabilitycu_screenshotno sensitive capabilitycu_scrollno sensitive capabilitycu_typeno sensitive capabilityqt_events_startno sensitive capabilityqt_events_stopno sensitive capabilityqt_methods_invokeno sensitive capabilityqt_models_datano sensitive capabilityqt_models_listno sensitive capabilityqt_models_searchno sensitive capabilityqt_names_listno sensitive capabilityqt_names_loadno sensitive capabilityqt_names_registerno sensitive capabilityqt_names_unregisterno sensitive capabilityqt_names_validateno sensitive capabilityqt_objects_inspectno sensitive capabilityqt_objects_searchno sensitive capabilityqt_objects_treeno sensitive capabilityqt_pingno sensitive capabilityqt_properties_getno sensitive capabilityqt_properties_setno sensitive capabilityqt_signals_setLifecycleno sensitive capabilityqt_signals_subscribeno sensitive capabilityqt_signals_unsubscribeno sensitive capabilityqt_ui_clickno sensitive capabilityqt_ui_clickItemno sensitive capabilityqt_ui_geometryno sensitive capabilityqt_ui_hitTestno sensitive capabilityqt_ui_screenshotno sensitive capabilityqt_ui_sendKeysno sensitive capabilityqt_versionno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_connect_probeno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_disconnect_probeno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_log_startno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_log_statusno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_log_stopno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_recording_startno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_recording_statusno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_recording_stopno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_set_modeno sensitive capabilityqtpilot_statusno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (58 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.5 latest |
A 99/100 | 0 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan qtpilot --online --registry pypiMore in Developer Tools
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.