procsi
npm
v0.9.0
Published by mtford90 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/tui/utils/clipboard.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; /** * Copy text to the system clipboard. * Uses pbcopy on macOS, xclip on Linu
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/tui/utils/clipboard.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/tui/utils/open-external.js:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; const TEMP_DIR_NAME = "procsi-exports"; /** * Get the platform-specific command
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/tui/utils/open-external.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/tui/utils/terminal-size.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: spawnSync } from "node:child_process"; function isPositiveInteger(value) { return typeof value === "number" && Numb
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/tui/utils/terminal-size.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/shared/browser.js:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ecFileSync } from "node:child_process"; // ── Constants ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/shared/browser.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/shared/daemon.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; import { getProcsiPaths, readDaemonPid
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/shared/daemon.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/shared/process-name.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ecFileSync } from "node:child_process"; import * as path from "node:path"; const PROCESS_NAME_TIMEOUT_MS = 1000; /** *
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/shared/process-name.js
Untrusted-input tools ([procsi_list_requests, procsi_get_request]) co-exist with external-action tools ([procsi_list_requests, procsi_get_request, procsi_count_requests, procsi_clear_requests, procsi_replay_request, procsi_save_request, procsi_unsave_request]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [procsi_list_requests, procsi_get_request] → sinks [procsi_list_requests, procsi_get_request, procsi_count_requests, procsi_clear_requests, procsi_rep
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow procsi_list_requests → procsi_list_requests
In the server's implementation (`dist/daemon/interceptor-loader.js:123`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const mod = await jiti.import(filePath); const { interceptors: extracted, errors } = extractInterceptor
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/daemon/interceptor-loader.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/overrides/node.js:51`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: " var mod = require(modName);", " var origRequest = mod.request;", " mod.request =
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/overrides/node.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
procsi_get_requestingests untrusted inputnetwork egressprocsi_list_requestsingests untrusted inputnetwork egressprocsi_clear_requestsnetwork egressprocsi_count_requestsnetwork egressprocsi_replay_requestnetwork egressprocsi_save_requestnetwork egressprocsi_unsave_requestnetwork egressprocsi_delete_interceptorno sensitive capabilityprocsi_get_interceptor_eventsno sensitive capabilityprocsi_get_statusno sensitive capabilityprocsi_list_interceptorsno sensitive capabilityprocsi_list_sessionsno sensitive capabilityprocsi_query_jsonno sensitive capabilityprocsi_reload_interceptorsno sensitive capabilityprocsi_search_bodiesno sensitive capabilityprocsi_write_interceptorno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.9.0 latest |
A 93/100 | 9 | 1.10.0 | 2026-07-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan procsi --online
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.