Bob Control MCP Server

@pounceai/bob-control npm v2.3.1

Published by @pounceai — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Bob Control: MCP server + CLI + worker that runs IBM Bob (and any MCP-capable agent) unattended against a SQLite task board.

Trust grade
B
83/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 83/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 83/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 11 = 83. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

high Dynamic code execution in server code (dist/command-policy.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`dist/command-policy.js:96`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: \b/i, why: "node inline eval (-e/-p)" }, { re: /\bnode\b[^|&;\n]*\s--(eval|print)\b/i, why: "node inline eval (--eva

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/command-policy.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/bob-polls.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/bob-polls.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { snapshotWorktreeTreeBounded } from "./git.js"; /** * Run the verificat

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/bob-polls.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/git.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/git.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { resolve } from "node:path"; import { rmSync } from "node:fs"; /** * Ru

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/git.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/llm.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/llm.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: nodeSpawn } from "node:child_process"; export const DEFAULT_MODELS = { api: "claude-haiku-4-5", cli: "claude-so

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/llm.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/notify.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/notify.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; // Fire-and-forget desktop notification. On Windows, optionally plays a system /

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/notify.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/llm.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/llm.js:88`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: " ? spawn(`"${cli}" ${argv.join(" ")}`, { shell: true, stdio: ["pipe", "pipe", "pipe"] })

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/llm.js

Tools 23

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_next_taskingests untrusted input
  • add_task_noteno sensitive capability
  • answer_task_questionno sensitive capability
  • arm_boardno sensitive capability
  • ask_questionno sensitive capability
  • await_answerno sensitive capability
  • await_taskno sensitive capability
  • board_reportno sensitive capability
  • board_statusno sensitive capability
  • claim_taskno sensitive capability
Show 13 more tools ↓
  • create_taskno sensitive capability
  • delete_taskno sensitive capability
  • disarm_boardno sensitive capability
  • get_taskno sensitive capability
  • list_tasksno sensitive capability
  • predict_modeno sensitive capability
  • record_artifactno sensitive capability
  • release_tasksno sensitive capability
  • revert_taskno sensitive capability
  • set_task_dependenciesno sensitive capability
  • set_task_modeno sensitive capability
  • submit_resultno sensitive capability
  • update_task_statusno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.3.1 latest B 83/100 6 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v2.3.0 B 83/100 6 1.12.1 2026-08-14
v2.2.0 B 83/100 6 1.12.1 2026-08-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 83/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pounceai-bob-control/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pounceai-bob-control)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pounceai-bob-control"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pounceai-bob-control/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pounceai-bob-control/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @pounceai/bob-control --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools