Portainer (hlavrencic) MCP Server

portainer-mcp-server npm v1.0.0 Source verified

Published by hlavrencic — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

MCP server for Portainer REST API — manage Docker containers, stacks, images, networks and volumes via AI assistants

View on npm ↗ Repository ↗ Raw report (JSON) ↗

Trust grade

97/100

Last scanned 2026-09-07 get badge →

Trust

A · 97/100

Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.

Capability

Moderate

Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.

Coverage

Source

How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.

A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 97/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 3 = 97. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

Points	Adoption-risk factor
−3	capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 0

✓ No findings. The scan raised nothing on this surface — see Coverage for how deep it could look.

Tools 13

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

get_container_logsreads sensitive data
get_stack_fileno sensitive capability
inspect_containerno sensitive capability
inspect_stackno sensitive capability
list_containersno sensitive capability
list_environmentsno sensitive capability
list_imagesno sensitive capability
list_networksno sensitive capability
list_stacksno sensitive capability
list_volumesno sensitive capability

Show 3 more tools ↓

restart_containerno sensitive capability
start_containerno sensitive capability
stop_containerno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Tools were statically extracted from the published source (13 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

Version	Score	Findings	Engine	Scanned
`v1.0.0` latest	A 97/100	0	1.13.0	2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

Markdown (GitHub README)

[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/portainer-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/portainer-mcp-server)

HTML

<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/portainer-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/portainer-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>

Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/portainer-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan portainer-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Portainer 2

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 3 side by side →

Portainer (ginkida) PyPI

portainer-mcp

MCP server that gives AI assistants 41 tools to manage Portainer: deploy stacks, manage containers, volumes, networks, exec commands, pull images, inspect endpoints, monitor resources, analyze logs, debug Laravel apps

Developer Tools Score 99/100 0 findings Cap. Minimal

Portainer (PyPI) PyPI

mcp-portainer

Portainer MCP server — manage Docker, Kubernetes, stacks, and Helm via the Model Context Protocol.

Developer Tools Score 98/100 0 findings Cap. Minimal