Pensieve MCP Server
pensieve-mcp
PyPI
v0.1.0
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 26
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
get_streamingests untrusted inputadd_assetno sensitive capabilityadd_noteno sensitive capabilitycreate_streamno sensitive capabilityedit_entityno sensitive capabilityedit_noteno sensitive capabilityedit_streamno sensitive capabilityfile_noteno sensitive capabilityfind_entitiesno sensitive capabilityget_entityno sensitive capability
Show 16 more tools ↓
list_assetsno sensitive capabilitylist_entitiesno sensitive capabilitylist_streamsno sensitive capabilitypromote_entityno sensitive capabilityrecentno sensitive capabilityremove_assetno sensitive capabilityremove_entityno sensitive capabilityremove_noteno sensitive capabilityremove_streamno sensitive capabilityrestore_entityno sensitive capabilityrestore_noteno sensitive capabilityrestore_streamno sensitive capabilitysearchno sensitive capabilitytag_noteno sensitive capabilityunfile_noteno sensitive capabilityuntag_noteno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (26 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.0 latest |
A 95/100 | 0 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan pensieve-mcp --online --registry pypiMore in Productivity & Workflow
Security scan results for the Agentchat MCP server.
Security scan results for the Airthings Consumer MCP server.
Security scan results for the Anki MCP server.
Security scan results for the Apple Notes Ts MCP server.
Security scan results for the Bullet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Canny MCP server.