Comfyui (peleke.s) MCP Server

@peleke.s/comfyui-mcp npm v1.0.1 Source verified

Published by peleke — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

40-tool MCP server for ComfyUI: image generation, ControlNet, IP-Adapter, inpainting, TTS voice cloning, lip-sync video, and AnimateDiff — with smart prompt optimization across 6 model families (Flux, SDXL, SD1.5, Illustrious, Pony, Realistic).

Trust grade
A
94/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 94/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 94/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/viewer.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/viewer.js:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: / import { exec } from "child_process"; import { promisify } from "util"; import * as fs from "fs/promises"; import * as

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/viewer.js

Tools 40

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • batch_create_portraitsno sensitive capability
  • check_connectionno sensitive capability
  • craft_promptno sensitive capability
  • create_maskno sensitive capability
  • create_portraitno sensitive capability
  • execute_pipelineno sensitive capability
  • generate_imageno sensitive capability
  • generate_with_compositionno sensitive capability
  • generate_with_controlnetno sensitive capability
  • generate_with_hidden_imageno sensitive capability
Show 30 more tools ↓
  • generate_with_ipadapterno sensitive capability
  • generate_with_multi_controlnetno sensitive capability
  • generate_with_poseno sensitive capability
  • get_prompting_guideno sensitive capability
  • get_queue_statusno sensitive capability
  • image_to_videono sensitive capability
  • imagineno sensitive capability
  • img2imgno sensitive capability
  • inpaintno sensitive capability
  • lipsync_generateno sensitive capability
  • list_animatediff_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_avatarsno sensitive capability
  • list_controlnet_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_lipsync_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_lorasno sensitive capability
  • list_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_prompting_strategiesno sensitive capability
  • list_samplersno sensitive capability
  • list_schedulersno sensitive capability
  • list_tts_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_upscale_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_voicesno sensitive capability
  • list_voices_catalogno sensitive capability
  • outpaintno sensitive capability
  • ping_comfyuino sensitive capability
  • preprocess_control_imageno sensitive capability
  • stylize_photono sensitive capability
  • talkno sensitive capability
  • tts_generateno sensitive capability
  • upscale_imageno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.1 latest A 94/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 94/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/peleke-s-comfyui-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/peleke-s-comfyui-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/peleke-s-comfyui-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/peleke-s-comfyui-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/peleke-s-comfyui-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @peleke.s/comfyui-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Comfyui 4

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 5 side by side →

More in Design & Media