Pdf Context MCP Server
pdf-context
PyPI
v0.1.1
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 2.1 = 98. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −2.1 | Package has no source repository MTC-SUP-011 | supply-chain |
2. Client adoption risk — 98 − 5 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| ✓ | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −5 | publisher verification (unlocatable) — no provenance and no public repository to inspect |
| ✓ | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 1
low Package has no source repositoryMTC-SUP-011
"pdf-context" declares no repository URL, so its published artifact cannot be compared against reviewable source.
Fix: Prefer packages that link to public, reviewable source.
Location: package pdf-context
Tools 10
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
get_document_profile_toolno sensitive capabilityget_ingest_status_toolno sensitive capabilityget_next_chunks_toolno sensitive capabilityget_section_content_toolno sensitive capabilitylist_chapters_toolno sensitive capabilitylist_documents_toolno sensitive capabilitylist_structure_toolno sensitive capabilityreingest_document_toolno sensitive capabilitysearch_pdf_context_toolno sensitive capabilityset_document_type_toolno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (10 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.1 latest |
A 93/100 | 1 | 1.8.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan pdf-context --online --registry pypiMore in Design & Media
Security scan results for the Aleph Siliconflow MCP server.
Security scan results for the Alphabanana MCP server.
Security scan results for the Astroway MCP server.
Security scan results for the Blade MCP server.
Security scan results for the Cinema4d MCP server.
Security scan results for the Douban Mcp Cli MCP server.