Pbi Webview2 MCP Server

pbi-webview2 npm v1.2.0

Published by bibiibjorn — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server that drives the LIVE Power BI Desktop report canvas (WebView2) over CDP — switch pages, click slicers, fire bookmarks, read cards/matrices as data, judge cross-filters, run the Performance Analyzer, and screenshot, with no reload and no OCR.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 8

high Tool "pbi_eval" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "pbi_eval" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "eval" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool pbi_eval

high Tool "pbi_run_code" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "pbi_run_code" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "run_code" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool pbi_run_code

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/tools.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/tools.js:1141`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const fn = eval('(' + code + ')'); return typeof fn === 'function' ? fn() : fn; }

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/tools.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/launch.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/launch.js:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import fs from 'node:fs'; import path from 'node:path'; const CDP_HOST = '127.0

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/launch.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([pbi_drill]) co-exist with external-action tools ([pbi_eval, pbi_run_code]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [pbi_drill] → sinks [pbi_eval, pbi_run_code]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow pbi_drill → pbi_eval

medium Unconstrained command parameter "code" on "pbi_run_code"MTC-CAP-006

Tool "pbi_run_code" takes a command-shaped parameter "code" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.

Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.

Location: tool pbi_run_code · inputSchema.properties.code

low Mutating tool "pbi_eval" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "pbi_eval" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool pbi_eval

low Mutating tool "pbi_run_code" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "pbi_run_code" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool pbi_run_code

Tools 55

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • pbi_drillingests untrusted input
  • pbi_evalruns code / shell
  • pbi_run_coderuns code / shell
  • pbi_annotate_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • pbi_assertno sensitive capability
  • pbi_baselineno sensitive capability
  • pbi_clickno sensitive capability
  • pbi_closeno sensitive capability
  • pbi_context_menuno sensitive capability
  • pbi_cross_filter_testno sensitive capability
Show 45 more tools ↓
  • pbi_dax_batchno sensitive capability
  • pbi_dax_queryno sensitive capability
  • pbi_deep_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • pbi_deselectno sensitive capability
  • pbi_dialogno sensitive capability
  • pbi_diff_stateno sensitive capability
  • pbi_editor_bufferno sensitive capability
  • pbi_emulate_themeno sensitive capability
  • pbi_expand_allno sensitive capability
  • pbi_fire_bookmarkno sensitive capability
  • pbi_format_daxno sensitive capability
  • pbi_goto_pageno sensitive capability
  • pbi_healthno sensitive capability
  • pbi_hover_tooltipno sensitive capability
  • pbi_keyboard_navno sensitive capability
  • pbi_launchno sensitive capability
  • pbi_matrix_expandno sensitive capability
  • pbi_model_infono sensitive capability
  • pbi_multiselect_slicerno sensitive capability
  • pbi_page_digestno sensitive capability
  • pbi_page_sweepno sensitive capability
  • pbi_pagesno sensitive capability
  • pbi_perf_analyzerno sensitive capability
  • pbi_read_cardsno sensitive capability
  • pbi_read_dax_editorno sensitive capability
  • pbi_read_filtersno sensitive capability
  • pbi_read_matrixno sensitive capability
  • pbi_read_slicerno sensitive capability
  • pbi_read_tableno sensitive capability
  • pbi_read_tmdlno sensitive capability
  • pbi_reloadno sensitive capability
  • pbi_saveno sensitive capability
  • pbi_scan_errorsno sensitive capability
  • pbi_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • pbi_search_slicerno sensitive capability
  • pbi_set_slicerno sensitive capability
  • pbi_show_as_tableno sensitive capability
  • pbi_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • pbi_sort_columnno sensitive capability
  • pbi_state_probeno sensitive capability
  • pbi_statusno sensitive capability
  • pbi_typeno sensitive capability
  • pbi_visualsno sensitive capability
  • pbi_wait_forno sensitive capability
  • pbi_wait_stableno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.2.0 latest A 93/100 8 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pbi-webview2/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pbi-webview2)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pbi-webview2"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pbi-webview2/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/pbi-webview2/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan pbi-webview2 --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Security & Testing