Overleaf Forge MCP Server

overleaf-forge npm v2.9.1

Published by nomanfoundhere — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 10

high Read-and-egress in one tool: "upload_file"MTC-FLOW-003

Tool "upload_file" can both read sensitive data and send data to an external destination. Even without an explicit untrusted-input leg, this is a single-call data-exfiltration path if the model is ever manipulated.

Fix: Separate reading from sending; require explicit user confirmation before egress of file/secret contents.

Location: flow upload_file

high Sensitive-source and external-sink co-existMTC-FLOW-004

Tools that read sensitive data ([list_files, read_file, write_file, upload_file]) and tools that can send data out ([upload_file]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.

Evidence: sources [list_files, read_file, write_file, upload_file] → sinks [upload_file]

Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.

Location: flow list_files → upload_file

high Shell/command execution in server code (overleaf-mcp-server.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`overleaf-mcp-server.js:12`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: xecFileCallback } from 'child_process'; import path from 'path'; import { fileURLToPath } from 'url'; import os from 'os

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server overleaf-mcp-server.js

medium Tool "edit_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "edit_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "edit_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool edit_file

medium Tool "write_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool write_file

low Mutating tool "edit_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "edit_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool edit_file

low Mutating tool "write_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool write_file

low Unconstrained path parameter "filePath" on "read_file"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "read_file" takes a path parameter "filePath" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool read_file · inputSchema.properties.filePath

low Unconstrained path parameter "filePath" on "edit_file"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "edit_file" takes a path parameter "filePath" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool edit_file · inputSchema.properties.filePath

low Unconstrained path parameter "filePath" on "write_file"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "write_file" takes a path parameter "filePath" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool write_file · inputSchema.properties.filePath

Tools 24

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • upload_filereads sensitive datanetwork egress
  • write_filereads sensitive datawrites files
  • edit_filewrites files
  • list_filesreads sensitive data
  • read_filereads sensitive data
  • add_citationno sensitive capability
  • bootstrap_ssano sensitive capability
  • checkpointno sensitive capability
  • cite_lintno sensitive capability
  • compile_fileno sensitive capability
Show 14 more tools ↓
  • configureno sensitive capability
  • get_contextno sensitive capability
  • get_section_contentno sensitive capability
  • get_sectionsno sensitive capability
  • list_projectsno sensitive capability
  • register_projectno sensitive capability
  • reset_ssa_contentno sensitive capability
  • restoreno sensitive capability
  • search_textno sensitive capability
  • set_project_pathno sensitive capability
  • status_summaryno sensitive capability
  • update_contextno sensitive capability
  • verify_buildno sensitive capability
  • voice_lintno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 2

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.9.1 latest A 93/100 10 1.10.0 2026-07-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/overleaf-forge/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/overleaf-forge)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/overleaf-forge"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/overleaf-forge/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/overleaf-forge/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan overleaf-forge --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools