ormcp-server
PyPI
v0.6.7
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
MCP server that connects AI applications to relational databases via object-relational mapping (ORM)
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 5.4 = 95. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −5.4 | Near-miss of @sentry/mcp-server ×2 MTC-SUP-005 | supply-chain |
2. Client adoption risk — 95 − 8 = 87. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`package/client/ormcp_client_example.py:37`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: self.process = subprocess.Popen( server_command, stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server package/client/ormcp_client_example.py
In the server's implementation (`src/microservice_ensure.py:168`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: exists result = subprocess.run( ["docker", "ps", "-a", "--filter", f"name={container_name}", "--form
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/microservice_ensure.py
"ormcp-server" is edit-distance 2 from the high-traffic package "@sentry/mcp-server". Verify this is the intended package.
Fix: Confirm you meant "@sentry/mcp-server". Install packages only from their documented, official name.
Location: package ormcp-server
"ormcp-server" is edit-distance 2 from the package "@heroku/mcp-server". Verify this is the intended package.
Fix: Confirm you meant "@heroku/mcp-server". Install packages only from their documented, official name.
Location: package ormcp-server
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
accessno sensitive capabilityaddno sensitive capabilitydeleteno sensitive capabilitydelete2no sensitive capabilityget_resourceno sensitive capabilityget_server_versionno sensitive capabilitygetAggregateno sensitive capabilitygetObjectByIdno sensitive capabilitygetObjectModelSummaryno sensitive capabilityinsertno sensitive capabilitylist_resourcesno sensitive capabilityqueryno sensitive capabilityupdateno sensitive capabilityupdate2no sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.6.7 latest |
B 87/100 | 4 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
v0.6.6 |
B 87/100 | 4 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-02 |
v0.6.3 |
B 87/100 | 4 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-01 |
v0.6.2 |
B 87/100 | 4 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-31 |
v0.6.1 |
B 87/100 | 4 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-27 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan ormcp-server --online --registry pypi
Security scan results for the A5sql MCP server.
Expose AgentsKit tools as an MCP server — use them from Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP host.
MCP server for Aiven cloud data platform - manage PostgreSQL, Kafka, and other services
MCP Server for All-Inkl.com hosting via KAS API
Structured aquarium, marine, terrarium and paludarium data for AI agents.
MCP server that gives your AI agent real vehicle data — specs, representative images, federal recalls, owner complaints, service bulletins, defect investigations, and OBD-II DTC reference — from the CarVector API.