Onetool MCP Server

onetool-mcp PyPI v2.2.2

Published by beycom — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

🧿 One MCP for developers - No tool tax, no context rot. 100+ tools including Brave, Google, Context7, Excalidraw, AWS, Version Checker, Excel, File Ops, Database, Playwright, Chrome DevTools and many more.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 15

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (src/otdev/tools/aws_util.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`src/otdev/tools/aws_util.py:749`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ession and write it to ~/.aws/credentials. Looks up the MFA device associated with the profile's IAM user, call

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/otdev/tools/aws_util.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (packages/onetool-pack/src/otpack/text.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`packages/onetool-pack/src/otpack/text.py:62`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ut """ result = subprocess.run( args, timeout=timeout, cwd=cwd, capture_output=T

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server packages/onetool-pack/src/otpack/text.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/onetool/cli_commands/direct_app.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/onetool/cli_commands/direct_app.py:261`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: 32": proc = subprocess.Popen( cmd, creationflags=subprocess.DETACHED_PROCESS

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/onetool/cli_commands/direct_app.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/linter.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/linter.py:37`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: y: result = subprocess.run( ["ruff", "--version"], capture_output=True,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/linter.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/pack_proxy.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/pack_proxy.py:270`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ict suitable for use as exec() globals """ from ot.executor.worker_proxy import WorkerPackProxy from ot.prox

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/pack_proxy.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/runner.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/runner.py:312`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ut_buffer): exec(wrapped_code, namespace) result = namespace.get("__result__") stdout_output

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/runner.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/validator.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/validator.py:638`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: e code specifically for exec() execution. This is a stricter validation that also checks for patterns that are

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/validator.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/worker_pool.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/worker_pool.py:229`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: _cwd process = subprocess.Popen( cmd, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subproc

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/worker_pool.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/utils/truncate.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/utils/truncate.py:62`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: """ result = subprocess.run( args, timeout=timeout, cwd=cwd, capture_outp

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/utils/truncate.py

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (src/otdev/tools/webfetch.py)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`src/otdev/tools/webfetch.py:198`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: content = webfetch.fetch("https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio.html") # Get plain text with faster ex

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/otdev/tools/webfetch.py

low Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment in packaging/dev tooling (tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py)MTC-SRC-006

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py:1804`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ic="test", file="~/.ssh/id_rsa") assert "Error" in result assert "not found" in result.lower() or "outs

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py

low Dynamic code execution in packaging/dev tooling (tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py)MTC-SRC-001

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py:289`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: e = """ exec('x = 1') eval('2 + 2') """ result = validate_python_code(code) assert result.valid is False

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (packages/onetool-pack/tests/test_boundary.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`packages/onetool-pack/tests/test_boundary.py:18`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: tions).""" result = subprocess.run( [sys.executable, str(SCRIPT)], capture_output=True, text

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server packages/onetool-pack/tests/test_boundary.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (scripts/release_publish.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/release_publish.py:45`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: " $ {cmd}") return subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True, cwd=PROJECT_ROOT, check=check) def confirm(prompt: str) -> boo

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server scripts/release_publish.py

low Dynamic module load from a non-literal in packaging/dev tooling (tests/unit/core/test_result_store.py)MTC-SRC-005

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/unit/core/test_result_store.py:601`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: io.run( __import__( "ot.executor.runner", fromlist=["execute_command"]

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/unit/core/test_result_store.py

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.2.2 latest A 93/100 15 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan onetool-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools