Onetool MCP Server

onetool-mcp PyPI v2.2.2

Published by beycom — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
D
63/100
Last scanned
Trust
D · 63/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
D Why this grade threat 70 − adoption risk = 63/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 30.4 = 70. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−22 Hardcoded GitHub token in server code MTC-SRC-008 exfiltration
−6.3 Unsafe deserialization MTC-SRC-007 permissions
−2.1 Package has no source repository MTC-SUP-011 supply-chain

2. Client adoption risk — 70 − 7 = 63. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable
inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see

Grade capped: 1 confirmed high finding → grade capped at C. A hard gate overrides the point total — no amount of clean surface buys back a confirmed catastrophe.

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 18

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (src/otdev/tools/aws_util.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`src/otdev/tools/aws_util.py:749`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: .aws/credentials

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/otdev/tools/aws_util.py

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py:1804`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ~/.ssh

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py

high Hardcoded GitHub token in server code (tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py)MTC-SRC-008

A live-looking GitHub token is hardcoded in `tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py:108`. Secrets in source ship to everyone who installs the package and are a direct credential leak.

Evidence: GitHub token: ghp_…(redacted)

Fix: Remove the secret, rotate it, and load credentials from the environment or a secret store.

Location: server tests/otutil/unit/tools/test_mem.py

high Dynamic code execution in server code (tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py:110`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: eval(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (packages/onetool-pack/src/otpack/text.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`packages/onetool-pack/src/otpack/text.py:62`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server packages/onetool-pack/src/otpack/text.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (packages/onetool-pack/tests/test_boundary.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`packages/onetool-pack/tests/test_boundary.py:18`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server packages/onetool-pack/tests/test_boundary.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (scripts/release_publish.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`scripts/release_publish.py:45`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server scripts/release_publish.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/onetool/cli_commands/direct_app.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/onetool/cli_commands/direct_app.py:261`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.Popen(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/onetool/cli_commands/direct_app.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/linter.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/linter.py:37`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/linter.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/pack_proxy.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/pack_proxy.py:270`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: exec(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/pack_proxy.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/runner.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/runner.py:149`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: exec(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/runner.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/validator.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/validator.py:411`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: os.system(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/validator.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/executor/worker_pool.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/executor/worker_pool.py:229`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.Popen(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/executor/worker_pool.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ot/utils/truncate.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ot/utils/truncate.py:62`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ot/utils/truncate.py

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (src/otdev/tools/webfetch.py)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`src/otdev/tools/webfetch.py:198`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: fetch("https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio.html"

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/otdev/tools/webfetch.py

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (tests/unit/core/test_result_store.py)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`tests/unit/core/test_result_store.py:601`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: __import__(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/unit/core/test_result_store.py

medium Unsafe deserialization (tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py)MTC-SRC-007

In the server's implementation (`tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py:223`): Deserializing untrusted data with these APIs can execute arbitrary code (a well-known RCE gadget class). This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: pickle.load(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/unit/core/test_code_validator.py

low Package has no source repositoryMTC-SUP-011

"onetool-mcp" declares no repository URL, so its published artifact cannot be compared against reviewable source.

Fix: Prefer packages that link to public, reviewable source.

Location: package onetool-mcp

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.2.2 latest C 70/100 18 1.5.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: D · 63/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/onetool-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan onetool-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools