Offlocal MCP Server

@offlocal/mcp npm v0.4.1

Published by @offlocal — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/actions.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/actions.js:52`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const data = await exec(); audit("success"); return { ...base, status: "ok", policy_decision: "allo

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/actions.js

low Unconstrained path parameter "path" on "list_github_repo_files"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "list_github_repo_files" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool list_github_repo_files · inputSchema.properties.path

Tools 38

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_app_logsingests untrusted input
  • get_github_repo_readmeingests untrusted input
  • get_railway_logsingests untrusted input
  • get_vercel_deployment_logsingests untrusted input
  • get_vercel_logsingests untrusted input
  • list_github_repo_filesreads sensitive data
  • query_supabasereads sensitive data
  • read_project_memoryingests untrusted input
  • add_environmentno sensitive capability
  • check_policyno sensitive capability
Show 28 more tools ↓
  • create_projectno sensitive capability
  • create_railway_deploymentno sensitive capability
  • create_stripe_priceno sensitive capability
  • create_stripe_productno sensitive capability
  • create_vercel_deploymentno sensitive capability
  • get_github_repo_contextno sensitive capability
  • get_latest_deployment_logsno sensitive capability
  • get_project_contextno sensitive capability
  • get_provider_mappingno sensitive capability
  • get_railway_deploymentsno sensitive capability
  • get_railway_project_contextno sensitive capability
  • get_supabase_project_contextno sensitive capability
  • get_vercel_deployment_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_vercel_deploymentsno sensitive capability
  • get_vercel_project_contextno sensitive capability
  • list_audit_logno sensitive capability
  • list_environmentsno sensitive capability
  • list_policy_rulesno sensitive capability
  • list_projectsno sensitive capability
  • list_provider_mappingsno sensitive capability
  • list_stripe_productsno sensitive capability
  • list_supabase_projectsno sensitive capability
  • map_provider_resourceno sensitive capability
  • select_projectno sensitive capability
  • set_policy_ruleno sensitive capability
  • set_railway_env_varno sensitive capability
  • set_vercel_env_varno sensitive capability
  • write_project_memoryno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.4.1 latest A 93/100 2 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/offlocal-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/offlocal-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/offlocal-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/offlocal-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/offlocal-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @offlocal/mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools