Nodriver Proxy MCP Server

nodriver-proxy-mcp PyPI v1.0.1

Published by bobongku — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/browser/session_manager.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/browser/session_manager.py:243`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: True proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, **popen_kwargs) if not self._wait_for_ipc(ipc_port, timeout=10.

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/browser/session_manager.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/codemode/tools.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/codemode/tools.py:113`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: subprocess.run( ["taskkill", "/F", "/T", "/PID", str(pid)], ca

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/codemode/tools.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/proxy/controller.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/proxy/controller.py:91`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: self._proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, **popen_kwargs) self._port = port # Drain stderr in ba

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/proxy/controller.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/sdk.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/sdk.py:682`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: True proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, **popen_kwargs) if not _wait_for_port(ipc_port, timeout=15.0):

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/nodriver_proxy_mcp/sdk.py

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([browser_intercept_disable, browser_list_intercept_rules, list_interception_rules]) co-exist with external-action tools ([generate_curl]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [browser_intercept_disable, browser_list_intercept_rules, list_interception_rules] → sinks [generate_curl]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow browser_intercept_disable → generate_curl

Tools 39

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • browser_intercept_disableingests untrusted input
  • browser_list_intercept_rulesingests untrusted input
  • generate_curlnetwork egress
  • list_interception_rulesingests untrusted input
  • add_interception_ruleno sensitive capability
  • browser_backno sensitive capability
  • browser_clickno sensitive capability
  • browser_closeno sensitive capability
  • browser_get_consoleno sensitive capability
  • browser_get_domno sensitive capability
Show 29 more tools ↓
  • browser_get_storageno sensitive capability
  • browser_get_textno sensitive capability
  • browser_gono sensitive capability
  • browser_intercept_requestno sensitive capability
  • browser_intercept_responseno sensitive capability
  • browser_jsno sensitive capability
  • browser_list_sessionsno sensitive capability
  • browser_list_tabsno sensitive capability
  • browser_openno sensitive capability
  • browser_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • browser_set_cookieno sensitive capability
  • browser_typeno sensitive capability
  • browser_waitno sensitive capability
  • clear_trafficno sensitive capability
  • detect_auth_patternno sensitive capability
  • execute_security_codeno sensitive capability
  • extract_from_flowno sensitive capability
  • extract_session_variableno sensitive capability
  • fuzz_endpointno sensitive capability
  • get_traffic_summaryno sensitive capability
  • inspect_flowno sensitive capability
  • list_session_variablesno sensitive capability
  • manage_proxyno sensitive capability
  • proxy_statusno sensitive capability
  • remove_interception_ruleno sensitive capability
  • replay_flowno sensitive capability
  • search_trafficno sensitive capability
  • send_raw_requestno sensitive capability
  • set_scopeno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.1 latest A 93/100 5 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nodriver-proxy-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nodriver-proxy-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nodriver-proxy-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nodriver-proxy-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nodriver-proxy-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan nodriver-proxy-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools