Sshmcp MCP Server

@nl4ever/sshmcp npm v2.2.3

Published by @nl4ever — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

SSH MCP Server — Let AI manage remote servers via SSH with zero-token SFTP file transfer, proxy support, and multi-server management using Model Context Protocol

Trust grade
B
83/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 83/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 83/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 11 = 83. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: download_directory → read_file → upload_file. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow download_directory → read_file → upload_file

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/ssh-manager.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/ssh-manager.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from 'child_process'; import { Client } from 'ssh2'; import { SocksClient } from 'socks'; export class

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/ssh-manager.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/ssh-manager.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/ssh-manager.js:284`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: y { execSync(`tar -czf "${tmpLocal}" -C "${localDir}" -T "${listFile}"`, { s

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/ssh-manager.js

medium Tool "write_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool write_file

low Mutating tool "write_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool write_file

Tools 21

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • download_directoryingests untrusted input
  • download_fileingests untrusted input
  • read_filereads sensitive data
  • upload_filenetwork egress
  • write_filewrites files
  • add_proxyno sensitive capability
  • add_serverno sensitive capability
  • connectno sensitive capability
  • delete_proxyno sensitive capability
  • delete_serverno sensitive capability
Show 11 more tools ↓
  • disconnectno sensitive capability
  • executeno sensitive capability
  • get_serverno sensitive capability
  • list_proxiesno sensitive capability
  • list_serversno sensitive capability
  • quick_connectno sensitive capability
  • rename_serverno sensitive capability
  • test_connectionno sensitive capability
  • transfer_statusno sensitive capability
  • update_serverno sensitive capability
  • upload_directoryno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.2.3 latest B 83/100 5 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 83/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nl4ever-sshmcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nl4ever-sshmcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nl4ever-sshmcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nl4ever-sshmcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nl4ever-sshmcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @nl4ever/sshmcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Other