Nanocart MCP Server

nanocart-mcp npm v1.2.0

Published by bytebunny-io — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Official NanoCart MCP server — manage your NanoCart store (products, orders, coupons, reports, settings) from any MCP-capable AI agent.

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([get_vendor, get_donation_campaign]) co-exist with external-action tools ([update_order]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [get_vendor, get_donation_campaign] → sinks [update_order]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow get_vendor → update_order

Tools 39

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_donation_campaigningests untrusted input
  • get_vendoringests untrusted input
  • update_ordernetwork egress
  • analytics_funnelno sensitive capability
  • archive_productno sensitive capability
  • create_categoryno sensitive capability
  • create_couponno sensitive capability
  • create_donation_campaignno sensitive capability
  • create_productno sensitive capability
  • create_vendorno sensitive capability
Show 29 more tools ↓
  • delete_couponno sensitive capability
  • delete_donation_campaignno sensitive capability
  • delete_vendorno sensitive capability
  • donations_reportno sensitive capability
  • get_settingsno sensitive capability
  • get_store_infono sensitive capability
  • get_storefrontno sensitive capability
  • get_tier_usageno sensitive capability
  • list_categoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_couponsno sensitive capability
  • list_donation_campaignsno sensitive capability
  • list_donation_supportersno sensitive capability
  • list_donationsno sensitive capability
  • list_ordersno sensitive capability
  • list_productsno sensitive capability
  • list_subscribersno sensitive capability
  • list_vendorsno sensitive capability
  • list_webhook_deliveriesno sensitive capability
  • resend_order_confirmationno sensitive capability
  • sales_reportno sensitive capability
  • send_order_to_vendorno sensitive capability
  • send_vendor_testno sensitive capability
  • update_categoryno sensitive capability
  • update_donation_campaignno sensitive capability
  • update_productno sensitive capability
  • update_settingsno sensitive capability
  • update_store_configno sensitive capability
  • update_vendorno sensitive capability
  • upload_imageno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.2.0 latest A 96/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-05
v1.1.0 A 96/100 1 1.12.1 2026-08-13
v1.0.1 A 96/100 0 1.12.1 2026-08-05

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nanocart-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nanocart-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nanocart-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nanocart-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/nanocart-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan nanocart-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Business & CRM