Mobile Device (saranshbamania) MCP Server

mobile-device-mcp npm v0.2.9

Published by saranshbamania — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server that gives AI coding assistants (Claude, Cursor, Windsurf) the ability to see and interact with Android mobile devices via ADB — AI-powered visual inspection, element finding, and device automation

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 3

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/drivers/android/adb.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/drivers/android/adb.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: as spawnCb } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; const execFile = promisify(execFileCb); /

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/drivers/android/adb.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/drivers/ios/simctl.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/drivers/ios/simctl.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: execFileCb } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; const execFile = promisify(execFileCb); c

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/drivers/ios/simctl.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/utils/discovery.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/utils/discovery.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: execFileCb } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; import { existsSync } from "node:fs"; imp

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/utils/discovery.js

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_logsreads sensitive data
  • analyze_screenno sensitive capability
  • double_tapno sensitive capability
  • extract_textno sensitive capability
  • fill_formno sensitive capability
  • find_elementno sensitive capability
  • flutter_connectno sensitive capability
  • flutter_debug_paintno sensitive capability
  • flutter_disconnectno sensitive capability
  • flutter_find_widgetno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • flutter_get_source_mapno sensitive capability
  • flutter_get_widget_detailsno sensitive capability
  • flutter_get_widget_treeno sensitive capability
  • flutter_hot_reloadno sensitive capability
  • flutter_hot_restartno sensitive capability
  • flutter_screenshot_widgetno sensitive capability
  • get_current_appno sensitive capability
  • get_device_infono sensitive capability
  • get_recorded_actionsno sensitive capability
  • get_screen_sizeno sensitive capability
  • get_ui_elementsno sensitive capability
  • handle_popupno sensitive capability
  • install_appno sensitive capability
  • ios_boot_simulatorno sensitive capability
  • ios_list_simulatorsno sensitive capability
  • ios_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • ios_shutdown_simulatorno sensitive capability
  • launch_appno sensitive capability
  • list_appsno sensitive capability
  • list_devicesno sensitive capability
  • long_pressno sensitive capability
  • press_keyno sensitive capability
  • record_screenno sensitive capability
  • smart_tapno sensitive capability
  • smart_typeno sensitive capability
  • start_test_recordingno sensitive capability
  • stop_appno sensitive capability
  • stop_recordingno sensitive capability
  • stop_test_recordingno sensitive capability
  • suggest_actionsno sensitive capability
  • swipeno sensitive capability
  • take_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • tapno sensitive capability
  • type_textno sensitive capability
  • uninstall_appno sensitive capability
  • verify_screenno sensitive capability
  • visual_diffno sensitive capability
  • wait_for_elementno sensitive capability
  • wait_for_settleno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.9 latest A 93/100 3 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mobile-device-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mobile-device-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mobile-device-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mobile-device-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mobile-device-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mobile-device-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Mobile Device 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Security & Testing