Memora (PyPI) MCP Server

memora-mcp PyPI v0.3.3

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

MCP-compatible memory server backed by SQLite

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (memora/backends.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`memora/backends.py:76`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: AWS credentials file: ~/.aws/credentials\n" " - For Cloudflare R2: Set AWS_ENDPOINT_URL to your R2 endpoin

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server memora/backends.py

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (memora/server.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`memora/server.py:2814`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ssh", ".gnupg", ".aws", ".config/gcloud", "id_rsa", "id_ed25519", ".env"] path_str = str(resolved).lower() for p

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server memora/server.py

medium Tool "memory_unlink" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "memory_unlink" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "unlink" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool memory_unlink

low Mutating tool "memory_unlink" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "memory_unlink" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool memory_unlink

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (memora-graph/scripts/sync-to-d1.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`memora-graph/scripts/sync-to-d1.py:268`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ectory result = subprocess.run( cmd, cwd=SCRIPT_DIR.parent, capture_output=T

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server memora-graph/scripts/sync-to-d1.py

Tools 43

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • memory_create_issuenetwork egress
  • memory_unlinkwrites files
  • memory_absorbno sensitive capability
  • memory_backfill_tagsno sensitive capability
  • memory_boostno sensitive capability
  • memory_clustersno sensitive capability
  • memory_createno sensitive capability
  • memory_create_batchno sensitive capability
  • memory_create_sectionno sensitive capability
  • memory_create_todono sensitive capability
Show 33 more tools ↓
  • memory_deleteno sensitive capability
  • memory_delete_batchno sensitive capability
  • memory_delete_documentno sensitive capability
  • memory_detect_supersessionsno sensitive capability
  • memory_digestno sensitive capability
  • memory_events_clearno sensitive capability
  • memory_events_pollno sensitive capability
  • memory_exportno sensitive capability
  • memory_export_graphno sensitive capability
  • memory_find_duplicatesno sensitive capability
  • memory_getno sensitive capability
  • memory_get_documentno sensitive capability
  • memory_hierarchyno sensitive capability
  • memory_hybrid_searchno sensitive capability
  • memory_importno sensitive capability
  • memory_insightsno sensitive capability
  • memory_linkno sensitive capability
  • memory_listno sensitive capability
  • memory_list_compactno sensitive capability
  • memory_mergeno sensitive capability
  • memory_migrate_imagesno sensitive capability
  • memory_rebuild_crossrefsno sensitive capability
  • memory_rebuild_embeddingsno sensitive capability
  • memory_relatedno sensitive capability
  • memory_semantic_searchno sensitive capability
  • memory_statsno sensitive capability
  • memory_store_documentno sensitive capability
  • memory_tag_hierarchyno sensitive capability
  • memory_tagsno sensitive capability
  • memory_updateno sensitive capability
  • memory_upload_imageno sensitive capability
  • memory_validate_tagsno sensitive capability
  • memory_verify_integrityno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.3 latest A 92/100 5 1.13.0 2026-08-25
v0.3.2 A 92/100 5 1.12.1 2026-08-12
v0.2.22 A 92/100 4 1.12.1 2026-07-27

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/memora-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/memora-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/memora-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/memora-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/memora-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan memora-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Memora 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Developer Tools