Md0ar Gsd MCP Server

@md0ar/gsd-mcp-server npm v2.1.0

Published by @md0ar — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for the GSD (Get Shit Done) lifecycle framework — manage specs, phases, milestones, and project state via MCP tools and resources

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

high Shell/command execution in server code (index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`index.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { readFileSync, existsSync } from "fs"; import { join } from "path"; impo

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server index.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (test-all.mjs)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`test-all.mjs:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import { existsSync, rmSync } from "fs"; import { join } from "path"; // Clean u

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server test-all.mjs

high Shell/command execution in server code (test-edge.mjs)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`test-edge.mjs:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import { existsSync, rmSync } from "fs"; import { join } from "path"; // Clean u

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server test-edge.mjs

high Shell/command execution in server code (test-functional.mjs)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`test-functional.mjs:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: n, execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { mkdirSync, writeFileSync, readFileSync, existsSync, rmSync } from "fs";

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server test-functional.mjs

Tools 34

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • gsd_add_phaseno sensitive capability
  • gsd_add_todono sensitive capability
  • gsd_audit_uatno sensitive capability
  • gsd_check_todosno sensitive capability
  • gsd_commitno sensitive capability
  • gsd_complete_milestoneno sensitive capability
  • gsd_config_getno sensitive capability
  • gsd_config_setno sensitive capability
  • gsd_debugno sensitive capability
  • gsd_discuss_phaseno sensitive capability
Show 24 more tools ↓
  • gsd_execute_phaseno sensitive capability
  • gsd_insert_phaseno sensitive capability
  • gsd_list_phasesno sensitive capability
  • gsd_map_codebaseno sensitive capability
  • gsd_new_milestoneno sensitive capability
  • gsd_new_projectno sensitive capability
  • gsd_phase_completeno sensitive capability
  • gsd_plan_phaseno sensitive capability
  • gsd_progressno sensitive capability
  • gsd_quickno sensitive capability
  • gsd_roadmap_analyzeno sensitive capability
  • gsd_runno sensitive capability
  • gsd_scaffoldno sensitive capability
  • gsd_set_profileno sensitive capability
  • gsd_settingsno sensitive capability
  • gsd_shipno sensitive capability
  • gsd_sketchno sensitive capability
  • gsd_spikeno sensitive capability
  • gsd_stateno sensitive capability
  • gsd_todo_completeno sensitive capability
  • gsd_validateno sensitive capability
  • gsd_verify_workno sensitive capability
  • gsd_websearchno sensitive capability
  • gsd_workstreamsno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.1.0 latest A 93/100 4 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/md0ar-gsd-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/md0ar-gsd-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/md0ar-gsd-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/md0ar-gsd-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/md0ar-gsd-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @md0ar/gsd-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Md0ar Gsd 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Productivity & Workflow