Mcptube MCP Server
mcptube
PyPI
v0.2.1
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 2
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcptube/ingestion/frames.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/mcptube/ingestion/frames.py:89`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: y: result = subprocess.run( cmd, capture_output=True, text=T
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcptube/ingestion/frames.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcptube/ingestion/scene_frames.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/mcptube/ingestion/scene_frames.py:125`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: y: result = subprocess.run( cmd, capture_output=True, text=T
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcptube/ingestion/scene_frames.py
Tools 21
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
wiki_listingests untrusted inputadd_videono sensitive capabilityask_videono sensitive capabilityask_videosno sensitive capabilityclassify_videono sensitive capabilitydiscover_videosno sensitive capabilitygenerate_reportno sensitive capabilitygenerate_report_from_queryno sensitive capabilityget_frameno sensitive capabilityget_frame_by_queryno sensitive capability
Show 11 more tools ↓
get_frame_datano sensitive capabilityget_infono sensitive capabilitylist_videosno sensitive capabilityremove_videono sensitive capabilitysave_tagsno sensitive capabilitysynthesizeno sensitive capabilitywiki_askno sensitive capabilitywiki_historyno sensitive capabilitywiki_searchno sensitive capabilitywiki_showno sensitive capabilitywiki_tocno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (21 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.2.1 latest |
A 92/100 | 2 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan mcptube --online --registry pypiMore in Analytics & Monitoring
Security scan results for the Admin Contracts MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ai Rotom MCP server.
Security scan results for the Airflow MCP server.
Security scan results for the Analytics MCP server.
AI-ready GIS, geofencing, DataSynch, CRM, inventory, routing, APIs, telemetry and workflows.
AI-native social listening. Monitor buying signals and run GTM workflows via natural language.