Workspace (MarcusJellinghaus) MCP Server

mcp-workspace PyPI v0.1.12

Published by marcusjellinghaus — no publish provenance and no vendor-owned scope, so the publisher could not be verified. The repository link below is self-declared.

Trust grade
B
83/100
Last scanned
Trust
B · 83/100
How safe the published surface and source look. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
B Why this grade 100 − 17.5 = 83/100

Every server starts at 100. These are the exact deductions the deterministic engine applied — each one reproducible, none of it an opinion or an LLM's guess:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−15.4 Obfuscated / encoded payload in server code MTC-SRC-004 injection
−2.1 Package has no source repository MTC-SUP-011 supply-chain

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind the deduction.

Findings 5

high Obfuscated / encoded payload in server code (tests/git_operations/test_compact_diffs_integration.py)MTC-SRC-004

In the server's implementation (`tests/git_operations/test_compact_diffs_integration.py:170`): Decoding an encoded blob and executing it is how malicious logic is hidden from human review of the source. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: \x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x01

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/git_operations/test_compact_diffs_integration.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcp_workspace/git_operations/verification.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_workspace/git_operations/verification.py:68`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/mcp_workspace/git_operations/verification.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (tools/tach_docs.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`tools/tach_docs.py:16`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tools/tach_docs.py

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (tests/github_operations/test_ci_results_manager_logs.py)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`tests/github_operations/test_ci_results_manager_logs.py:67`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: requests.assert_called_once_with( "https://api.github.com/repos/test/repo/actions/runs/123/logs"

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/github_operations/test_ci_results_manager_logs.py

low Package has no source repositoryMTC-SUP-011

"mcp-workspace" declares no repository URL, so its published artifact cannot be compared against reviewable source.

Fix: Prefer packages that link to public, reviewable source.

Location: package mcp-workspace

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.12 latest B 83/100 5 1.5.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 83/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-workspace/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-workspace)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-workspace"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-workspace/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-workspace/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-workspace --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Workspace 3

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 4 side by side →

More in Productivity & Workflow