mcp-souschef
PyPI
v7.3.1
Published by kpeacocke — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Tools that read sensitive data ([read_file]) and tools that can send data out ([parse_powershell, convert_powershell, generate_powershell_role, generate_powershell_job_template, analyze_powershell_fidelity, parse_bash_script, convert_bash_to_ansible, generate_ansible_role_from_bash]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.
Evidence: sources [read_file] → sinks [parse_powershell, convert_powershell, generate_powershell_role, generate_powershell_job_template, analyze_powershell_fidelity, pars
Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.
Location: flow read_file → parse_powershell
Tool "parse_powershell" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "powershell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool parse_powershell
Tool "convert_powershell" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "powershell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool convert_powershell
Tool "generate_powershell_role" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "powershell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool generate_powershell_role
Tool "generate_powershell_job_template" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "powershell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool generate_powershell_job_template
Tool "analyze_powershell_fidelity" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "powershell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool analyze_powershell_fidelity
Tool "parse_bash_script" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "bash" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool parse_bash_script
Tool "convert_bash_to_ansible" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "bash" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool convert_bash_to_ansible
Tool "generate_ansible_role_from_bash" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "bash" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool generate_ansible_role_from_bash
In the server's implementation (`souschef/ansible_upgrade.py:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: alls use list args, not shell=True from datetime import date from pathlib import Path from typing import Any, NotRequire
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/ansible_upgrade.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/cli/__init__.py:1667`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: p the server") subprocess.run(cmd, check=True) except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: click.ec
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/cli/__init__.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/converters/playbook.py:919`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ailure result = subprocess.run( ["ansible-lint", "--nocolor", "-p", tmp_path], capture_o
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/converters/playbook.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/generators/repo.py:601`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: Initialize git subprocess.run( ["git", "init"], cwd=repo_path, check=True,
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/generators/repo.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/migration_v2.py:1479`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: s] result = subprocess.run( ["ansible-lint", "--nocolor", *playbook_paths],
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/migration_v2.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/parsers/ansible_inventory.py:374`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( command, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True, timeout=10
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/parsers/ansible_inventory.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/parsers/powershell.py:345`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: turn None result = subprocess.run( [ pwsh_path, "-NoLogo", "-NoProfile"
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/parsers/powershell.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/ui/pages/cookbook_analysis.py:2470`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["which", "git"], capture_output=True, text=
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/ui/pages/cookbook_analysis.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/ui/pages/validation_reports.py:29`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( [sys.executable, "-m", "ansible_lint", str(playbook_path)],
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/ui/pages/validation_reports.py
In the server's implementation (`souschef/assessment.py:2901`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: response = requests.post( "https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages", headers={
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server souschef/assessment.py
Tool "parse_powershell" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool parse_powershell
Tool "convert_powershell" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool convert_powershell
Tool "generate_powershell_role" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool generate_powershell_role
Tool "generate_powershell_job_template" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool generate_powershell_job_template
Tool "analyze_powershell_fidelity" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool analyze_powershell_fidelity
Tool "parse_bash_script" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool parse_bash_script
Tool "convert_bash_to_ansible" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool convert_bash_to_ansible
Tool "generate_ansible_role_from_bash" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool generate_ansible_role_from_bash
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
analyze_powershell_fidelityruns code / shellconvert_bash_to_ansibleruns code / shellconvert_powershellruns code / shellgenerate_ansible_role_from_bashruns code / shellgenerate_powershell_job_templateruns code / shellgenerate_powershell_roleruns code / shellparse_bash_scriptruns code / shellparse_powershellruns code / shellread_filereads sensitive data_validate_databags_directoryno sensitive capabilityanalyse_chef_databag_usageno sensitive capabilityanalyse_chef_environment_usageno sensitive capabilityanalyse_chef_search_patternsno sensitive capabilityanalyse_cookbook_dependenciesno sensitive capabilityassess_ansible_upgrade_readinessno sensitive capabilityassess_chef_migration_complexityno sensitive capabilityassess_salt_migration_complexityno sensitive capabilityassign_github_copilot_to_issueno sensitive capabilitycheck_ansible_eol_statusno sensitive capabilitycheck_github_copilot_agent_statusno sensitive capabilityconfigure_migration_simulationno sensitive capabilityconvert_all_cookbooks_comprehensiveno sensitive capabilityconvert_chef_databag_to_varsno sensitive capabilityconvert_chef_environment_to_inventory_groupno sensitive capabilityconvert_chef_handler_to_ansibleno sensitive capabilityconvert_cookbook_comprehensiveno sensitive capabilityconvert_inspec_to_testno sensitive capabilityconvert_puppet_manifest_to_ansibleno sensitive capabilityconvert_puppet_manifest_to_ansible_with_aino sensitive capabilityconvert_puppet_module_to_ansibleno sensitive capabilityconvert_puppet_module_to_ansible_with_aino sensitive capabilityconvert_puppet_resource_to_taskno sensitive capabilityconvert_resource_to_taskno sensitive capabilityconvert_salt_directory_to_ansibleno sensitive capabilityconvert_salt_pillar_to_varsno sensitive capabilityconvert_salt_to_ansibleno sensitive capabilityconvert_template_with_aino sensitive capabilitydeploy_v2_migrationno sensitive capabilitygenerate_ansible_repositoryno sensitive capabilitygenerate_ansible_upgrade_test_planno sensitive capabilitygenerate_github_workflow_from_chefno sensitive capabilitygenerate_gitlab_ci_from_chefno sensitive capabilitygenerate_handler_routing_configno sensitive capabilitygenerate_inspec_from_recipeno sensitive capabilitygenerate_inventory_from_chef_environmentsno sensitive capabilitygenerate_jenkinsfile_from_chefno sensitive capabilitygenerate_migration_planno sensitive capabilitygenerate_migration_reportno sensitive capabilitygenerate_salt_inventoryno sensitive capabilitygenerate_salt_migration_reportno sensitive capabilitygenerate_windows_inventory_toolno sensitive capabilitygenerate_windows_requirementsno sensitive capabilityget_chef_cookbooksno sensitive capabilityget_chef_environmentsno sensitive capabilityget_chef_nodesno sensitive capabilityget_chef_policiesno sensitive capabilityget_chef_rolesno sensitive capabilityget_version_combination_infono sensitive capabilityimport_offline_bundleno sensitive capabilityimport_puppet_catalog_to_irno sensitive capabilitylist_cookbook_structureno sensitive capabilitylist_directoryno sensitive capabilitylist_migration_version_combinationsno sensitive capabilitylist_puppet_server_nodesno sensitive capabilitylist_puppet_supported_resource_typesno sensitive capabilityparse_attributesno sensitive capabilityparse_chef_handlerno sensitive capabilityparse_chef_migration_assessmentno sensitive capabilityparse_cookbook_metadatano sensitive capabilityparse_custom_resourceno sensitive capabilityparse_habitat_planno sensitive capabilityparse_inspec_profileno sensitive capabilityparse_puppet_manifestno sensitive capabilityparse_puppet_moduleno sensitive capabilityparse_recipeno sensitive capabilityparse_salt_directoryno sensitive capabilityparse_salt_pillarno sensitive capabilityparse_salt_slsno sensitive capabilityparse_salt_topno sensitive capabilityparse_templateno sensitive capabilitypause_github_copilot_agentno sensitive capabilityplan_ansible_upgradeno sensitive capabilityplan_salt_migrationno sensitive capabilityprofile_cookbook_performanceno sensitive capabilityprofile_parsing_operationno sensitive capabilityquery_chef_serverno sensitive capabilityquery_salt_masterno sensitive capabilityread_cookbook_metadatano sensitive capabilityresume_github_copilot_agentno sensitive capabilityrollback_v2_migrationno sensitive capabilitysimulate_chef_to_awx_migrationno sensitive capabilitystart_v2_migrationno sensitive capabilitystop_github_copilot_agentno sensitive capabilityvalidate_ansible_collection_compatibilityno sensitive capabilityvalidate_chef_server_connectionno sensitive capabilityvalidate_conversionno sensitive capabilityvalidate_v2_playbooksno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v7.3.1 latest |
A 93/100 | 27 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-souschef --online --registry pypi
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.