Servers (assagman) MCP Server

mcp-servers PyPI v0.1.10

Published by assagman — no publish provenance and no vendor-owned scope, so the publisher could not be verified. The repository link below is self-declared.

Trust grade
B
81/100
Last scanned
Trust
B · 81/100
How safe the published surface and source look. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
B Why this grade 100 − 18.6 = 81/100

Every server starts at 100. These are the exact deductions the deterministic engine applied — each one reproducible, none of it an opinion or an LLM's guess:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−18.6 Near-miss of @sentry/mcp-server ×2 MTC-SUP-005 supply-chain

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind the deduction.

Findings 4

high Shell/command execution in server code (mcp_servers/cli_app.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`mcp_servers/cli_app.py:167`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server mcp_servers/cli_app.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (mcp_servers/filesystem.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`mcp_servers/filesystem.py:296`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server mcp_servers/filesystem.py

high Near-miss of @sentry/mcp-server (edit distance 1)MTC-SUP-005

"mcp-servers" is edit-distance 1 from the high-traffic package "@sentry/mcp-server". Verify this is the intended package.

Fix: Confirm you meant "@sentry/mcp-server". Install packages only from their documented, official name.

Location: package mcp-servers

medium Near-miss of @heroku/mcp-server (edit distance 1)MTC-SUP-005

"mcp-servers" is edit-distance 1 from the package "@heroku/mcp-server". Verify this is the intended package.

Fix: Confirm you meant "@heroku/mcp-server". Install packages only from their documented, official name.

Location: package mcp-servers

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.10 latest B 81/100 4 1.5.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 81/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-servers-2/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-servers-2)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-servers-2"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-servers-2/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-servers-2/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-servers --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Servers 2

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 3 side by side →

More in Developer Tools