Splunk Oncall MCP Server

mcp-server-splunk-oncall PyPI v0.4.0

Published by arnstarn — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for Splunk On-Call (VictorOps) incident management

Trust grade
A
99/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 99/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Minimal
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 99/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 1 = 99. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 0

✓ No findings. The scan raised nothing on this surface — see Coverage for how deep it could look.

Tools 46

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • acknowledge_all_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • acknowledge_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • add_team_memberno sensitive capability
  • create_maintenanceno sensitive capability
  • create_policyno sensitive capability
  • create_routing_keyno sensitive capability
  • create_teamno sensitive capability
  • create_userno sensitive capability
  • delete_policyno sensitive capability
  • delete_routing_keyno sensitive capability
Show 36 more tools ↓
  • delete_teamno sensitive capability
  • delete_userno sensitive capability
  • end_maintenanceno sensitive capability
  • get_access_modeno sensitive capability
  • get_alertno sensitive capability
  • get_incident_historyno sensitive capability
  • get_incident_timelineno sensitive capability
  • get_maintenanceno sensitive capability
  • get_oncallno sensitive capability
  • get_oncall_reportno sensitive capability
  • get_org_infono sensitive capability
  • get_org_timelineno sensitive capability
  • get_policyno sensitive capability
  • get_teamno sensitive capability
  • get_team_adminsno sensitive capability
  • get_team_membersno sensitive capability
  • get_team_oncall_scheduleno sensitive capability
  • get_team_policiesno sensitive capability
  • get_userno sensitive capability
  • get_user_contact_methodsno sensitive capability
  • get_user_devicesno sensitive capability
  • get_user_oncall_scheduleno sensitive capability
  • get_user_policiesno sensitive capability
  • get_user_teamsno sensitive capability
  • list_alertsno sensitive capability
  • list_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • list_maintenanceno sensitive capability
  • list_policiesno sensitive capability
  • list_routing_keysno sensitive capability
  • list_teamsno sensitive capability
  • list_usersno sensitive capability
  • remove_team_memberno sensitive capability
  • reroute_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • resolve_all_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • resolve_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • update_teamno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.4.0 latest A 99/100 0 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 99/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-splunk-oncall/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-splunk-oncall)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-splunk-oncall"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-splunk-oncall/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-splunk-oncall/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-server-splunk-oncall --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools