Sentinel (clarencyu-boop) MCP Server

mcp-server-sentinel npm v2.0.0

Published by clarencyu-boop — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([get_backtest_result, okx_orderbook, list_strategies]) co-exist with external-action tools ([create_payment_link]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [get_backtest_result, okx_orderbook, list_strategies] → sinks [create_payment_link]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow get_backtest_result → create_payment_link

Tools 36

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • create_payment_linknetwork egress
  • get_backtest_resultingests untrusted input
  • list_strategiesingests untrusted input
  • okx_orderbookingests untrusted input
  • build_strategyno sensitive capability
  • cancel_backtestno sensitive capability
  • create_botno sensitive capability
  • create_crypto_invoiceno sensitive capability
  • delete_botno sensitive capability
  • get_account_infono sensitive capability
Show 26 more tools ↓
  • get_analysisno sensitive capability
  • get_analysis_historyno sensitive capability
  • get_botno sensitive capability
  • get_bot_performanceno sensitive capability
  • get_bot_tradesno sensitive capability
  • get_grid_resultsno sensitive capability
  • get_grid_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_plan_infono sensitive capability
  • get_signalsno sensitive capability
  • get_strategy_detailno sensitive capability
  • list_backtestsno sensitive capability
  • list_botsno sensitive capability
  • list_exchangesno sensitive capability
  • okx_algo_orderno sensitive capability
  • okx_funding_rateno sensitive capability
  • okx_market_overviewno sensitive capability
  • okx_positionsno sensitive capability
  • okx_set_leverageno sensitive capability
  • pause_botno sensitive capability
  • recover_botno sensitive capability
  • run_backtestno sensitive capability
  • run_grid_backtestno sensitive capability
  • start_botno sensitive capability
  • stop_botno sensitive capability
  • subscribe_strategyno sensitive capability
  • verify_paymentno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.0.0 latest A 96/100 1 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-sentinel/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-sentinel)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-sentinel"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-sentinel/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-server-sentinel/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-server-sentinel --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Sentinel 5

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 6 side by side →

More in Finance & Commerce