Security Toolkit MCP Server

mcp-security-toolkit PyPI v0.3.1

Published by x0base — no publish provenance and no vendor-owned scope, so the publisher could not be verified. The repository link below is self-declared.

Trust grade
A
98/100
Last scanned
Trust
A · 98/100
How safe the published surface and source look. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade 100 − 2.1 = 98/100

Every server starts at 100. These are the exact deductions the deterministic engine applied — each one reproducible, none of it an opinion or an LLM's guess:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−2.1 Package has no source repository MTC-SUP-011 supply-chain

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind the deduction.

Findings 8

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/mcp_security_toolkit/helpers/eval_expr.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_security_toolkit/helpers/eval_expr.py:3`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: eval(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/mcp_security_toolkit/helpers/eval_expr.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/interactsh.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/interactsh.py:185`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.Popen(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/interactsh.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/mcp_server_audit.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/mcp_server_audit.py:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/mcp_server_audit.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/phpggc_generate.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/phpggc_generate.py:101`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/mcp_security_toolkit/tools/phpggc_generate.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (tests/fixtures/sample_aliased_imports.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`tests/fixtures/sample_aliased_imports.py:13`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: shell=True

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/fixtures/sample_aliased_imports.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (tests/fixtures/sample_mcp_server.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`tests/fixtures/sample_mcp_server.py:19`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/fixtures/sample_mcp_server.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (tests/fixtures/v0_4/tool_shadowing_positive.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`tests/fixtures/v0_4/tool_shadowing_positive.py:19`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.check_output(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/fixtures/v0_4/tool_shadowing_positive.py

low Package has no source repositoryMTC-SUP-011

"mcp-security-toolkit" declares no repository URL, so its published artifact cannot be compared against reviewable source.

Fix: Prefer packages that link to public, reviewable source.

Location: package mcp-security-toolkit

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.1 latest A 98/100 8 1.5.0 2026-07-22

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 98/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-security-toolkit/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-security-toolkit)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-security-toolkit"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-security-toolkit/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-security-toolkit/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-security-toolkit --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Security & Testing