Screenshot (aamar-shahzad) MCP Server

mcp-screenshot-server PyPI v0.1.0

Published by aamar-shahzad — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for screenshot capture and image annotation with boxes, lines, arrows, and text

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcp_screenshot_server/server.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_screenshot_server/server.py:192`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: h) result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30) if result.returncod

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/mcp_screenshot_server/server.py

Tools 35

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • add_arrowno sensitive capability
  • add_borderno sensitive capability
  • add_boxno sensitive capability
  • add_circleno sensitive capability
  • add_highlightno sensitive capability
  • add_lineno sensitive capability
  • add_numbered_calloutno sensitive capability
  • add_textno sensitive capability
  • add_watermarkno sensitive capability
  • adjust_brightnessno sensitive capability
Show 25 more tools ↓
  • adjust_contrastno sensitive capability
  • annotateno sensitive capability
  • batch_annotateno sensitive capability
  • blur_regionno sensitive capability
  • capture_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • copy_to_clipboardno sensitive capability
  • crop_imageno sensitive capability
  • delete_imageno sensitive capability
  • duplicate_imageno sensitive capability
  • flip_imageno sensitive capability
  • get_imageno sensitive capability
  • get_image_base64no sensitive capability
  • get_undo_countno sensitive capability
  • label_regionsno sensitive capability
  • list_imagesno sensitive capability
  • load_imageno sensitive capability
  • open_file_in_previewno sensitive capability
  • open_in_previewno sensitive capability
  • precise_annotateno sensitive capability
  • quick_saveno sensitive capability
  • reset_callout_counterno sensitive capability
  • resize_imageno sensitive capability
  • rotate_imageno sensitive capability
  • save_imageno sensitive capability
  • undono sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.0 latest A 93/100 1 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-screenshot-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-screenshot-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-screenshot-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-screenshot-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-screenshot-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-screenshot-server --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Screenshot 8

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 9 side by side →

More in Design & Media