Proxmox (antonio-mello-ai) MCP Server

mcp-proxmox PyPI v1.2.2

Published by antonio-mello-ai — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for managing Proxmox VE clusters through AI assistants

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

high Tool "exec_command" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "exec_command" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool exec_command

low Mutating tool "exec_command" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "exec_command" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool exec_command

Tools 34

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • exec_commandruns code / shell
  • add_firewall_ruleno sensitive capability
  • clone_guestno sensitive capability
  • configure_cloud_initno sensitive capability
  • create_backupno sensitive capability
  • create_containerno sensitive capability
  • create_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • create_templateno sensitive capability
  • create_vmno sensitive capability
  • delete_firewall_ruleno sensitive capability
Show 24 more tools ↓
  • delete_guestno sensitive capability
  • delete_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • get_guest_metricsno sensitive capability
  • get_guest_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_node_statusno sensitive capability
  • list_backupsno sensitive capability
  • list_containersno sensitive capability
  • list_firewall_rulesno sensitive capability
  • list_networksno sensitive capability
  • list_nodesno sensitive capability
  • list_snapshotsno sensitive capability
  • list_storage_contentno sensitive capability
  • list_storagesno sensitive capability
  • list_tasksno sensitive capability
  • list_templatesno sensitive capability
  • list_vmsno sensitive capability
  • migrate_guestno sensitive capability
  • reboot_guestno sensitive capability
  • resize_guestno sensitive capability
  • restore_backupno sensitive capability
  • rollback_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • shutdown_guestno sensitive capability
  • start_guestno sensitive capability
  • stop_guestno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 2

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.2.2 latest A 93/100 2 1.13.0 2026-08-25
v1.2.1 A 93/100 2 1.12.1 2026-07-27

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-proxmox/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-proxmox)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-proxmox"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-proxmox/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-proxmox/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-proxmox --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Proxmox 8

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 9 side by side →

More in Cloud & DevOps