mcp-openstack-ops
PyPI
v3.5.2
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
OpenStack operations automation MCP server
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 2 = 98. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_openstack_ops/functions.py:16`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ces from .services.core import ( get_service_status ) # Import connection utilities from .connection import reset_c
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcp_openstack_ops/functions.py
In the server's implementation (`src/mcp_openstack_ops/services/__init__.py:9`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: r management from .core import ( get_service_status ) # Compute service functions from .compute import ( get_in
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcp_openstack_ops/services/__init__.py
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
get_availability_zonesno sensitive capabilityget_floating_ip_poolsno sensitive capabilityget_floating_ipsno sensitive capabilityget_heat_stacksno sensitive capabilityget_hypervisor_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_image_detail_listno sensitive capabilityget_instanceno sensitive capabilityget_instance_by_nameno sensitive capabilityget_instance_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_instances_by_statusno sensitive capabilityget_keypair_listno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_amphoraeno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_availability_zonesno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_flavorsno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_health_monitorsno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_l7_policiesno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_l7_rulesno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_listno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_listenersno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_pool_membersno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_poolsno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_providersno sensitive capabilityget_load_balancer_quotasno sensitive capabilityget_network_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_project_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_quotano sensitive capabilityget_resource_monitoringno sensitive capabilityget_role_assignmentsno sensitive capabilityget_routersno sensitive capabilityget_security_groupsno sensitive capabilityget_server_eventsno sensitive capabilityget_server_groupsno sensitive capabilityget_server_volumesno sensitive capabilityget_service_statusno sensitive capabilityget_usage_statisticsno sensitive capabilityget_user_listno sensitive capabilityget_volume_listno sensitive capabilityget_volume_snapshotsno sensitive capabilityget_volume_typesno sensitive capabilitysearch_instancesno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v3.5.2 latest |
A 98/100 | 2 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-openstack-ops --online --registry pypi
Operator control CLI for AdGuard Home with an MCP adapter
interacting with Aliyun (Alibaba Cloud) services through This MCP server provides tools.
MCP server for the Aspro.Cloud REST API
MCP server for Atlassian Confluence and Jira Cloud APIs
AuroraCloud-first MCP server that exposes AuroraDocs workspace data to Claude Desktop and other AI agents
The official AWS Knowledge Base retrieval server using Bedrock Agent Runtime.