Mcp (mcp.eztexting.com) MCP Server

https://mcp.eztexting.com/mcp/workflows Remote v1.0

Published by mcp.eztexting.com — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Official EZTexting MCP server: SMS/MMS messaging, contacts, workflows, and account administration.

Open the endpoint ↗ Raw report (JSON) ↗

Trust grade

97/100

Last scanned 2026-09-06 get badge →

Trust

A · 97/100

Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.

Capability

Moderate

Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.

Coverage

Live

How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.

A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 97/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 3 = 97. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

Points	Adoption-risk factor
−3	capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([wf_fetch, wf_list]) co-exist with external-action tools ([wf_save]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [wf_fetch, wf_list] → sinks [wf_save]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow wf_fetch → wf_save

Tools 8

Each tool and what it can reach — enumerated from the running server.

wf_fetchingests untrusted input
wf_listingests untrusted input
wf_savenetwork egress
wf_create_from_templateno sensitive capability
wf_schemano sensitive capability
wf_statno sensitive capability
wf_statusno sensitive capability
wf_templatesno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

Version	Score	Findings	Engine	Scanned
`v1.0` latest	A 97/100	1	1.13.0	2026-09-06

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

Markdown (GitHub README)

[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-eztexting-com-mcp-workflows/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-eztexting-com-mcp-workflows)

HTML

<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-eztexting-com-mcp-workflows"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-eztexting-com-mcp-workflows/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>

Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-eztexting-com-mcp-workflows/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan https://mcp.eztexting.com/mcp/workflows --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Mcp 6

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 7 side by side →

Workflows (transcend-io) Source verified npm

@transcend-io/mcp-server-workflows

Transcend MCP Server — Workflows tools.

API Development Score 100/100 0 findings 3.8k/wk Cap. Minimal

Workflows (cyanheads) npm

@cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server

Store, query, and create YAML workflow playbooks for LLM agents via MCP. STDIO or Streamable HTTP.

AI & Agents Score 99/100 0 findings 104/wk Cap. Minimal

Workflows (fiveohhwon) npm

@fiveohhwon/workflows-mcp

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) implementation for workflow management and automation.

AI & Agents Score 99/100 0 findings 29/wk Cap. Minimal

Workflows (cyanheads) npm

workflows-mcp-server

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that enables AI agents to discover, create, and execute complex, multi-step workflows defined in simple YAML files. Allow your AI agents to better organize their tool usage and provide a more structured way to handle

Developer Tools Score 99/100 0 findings 19/wk Cap. Minimal

Workflows (agentdesk) npm

@agentdesk/workflows-mcp

MCP workflow orchestration tool with presets for thinking, coding and more

Productivity & Workflow Score 98/100 2 findings 17/wk Cap. Minimal

Workflows (qtsone) PyPI

workflows-mcp

MCP server for DAG-based workflow execution with YAML definitions and LLM collaboration

Productivity & Workflow Score 93/100 3 findings Cap. High