Camunda7 MCP Server
mcp-camunda7
npm
v1.2.0
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 2 = 98. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 23
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
claim_taskno sensitive capabilitycomplete_taskno sensitive capabilitydelete_process_instanceno sensitive capabilitydeploy_bpmnno sensitive capabilityexecute_jobno sensitive capabilityget_activity_instancesno sensitive capabilityget_engine_infono sensitive capabilityget_process_definition_xmlno sensitive capabilityget_process_instanceno sensitive capabilityget_process_instance_variablesno sensitive capability
Show 13 more tools ↓
get_taskno sensitive capabilityget_task_variablesno sensitive capabilitylist_deploymentsno sensitive capabilitylist_history_activity_instancesno sensitive capabilitylist_history_process_instancesno sensitive capabilitylist_history_tasksno sensitive capabilitylist_incidentsno sensitive capabilitylist_jobsno sensitive capabilitylist_process_definitionsno sensitive capabilitylist_process_instancesno sensitive capabilitylist_tasksno sensitive capabilityset_job_retriesno sensitive capabilitystart_process_instanceno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (23 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.2.0 latest |
A 98/100 | 0 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-24 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-camunda7 --onlineMore in Developer Tools
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.