Mailbridge MCP Server

mailbridge-mcp npm v2.6.1

Published by creativestefan — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Connect your AI assistant to email — read, search, send, and organise via IMAP/SMTP

Trust grade
B
87/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 87/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 87/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Description names a credential store the tool cannot reach MTC-INJ-SCHEMA-1 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 7 = 87. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

high Shell/command execution in server code (index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`index.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from 'child_process'; import { dirname } from 'path'; import { fileURLToPath } from 'url'; const __dir

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server index.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([read_attachment, read_emails, get_emails_with_preview, get_thread, unified_inbox]) co-exist with external-action tools ([send_email]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [read_attachment, read_emails, get_emails_with_preview, get_thread, unified_inbox] → sinks [send_email]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow read_attachment → send_email

medium Description names a credential store the tool cannot reachMTC-INJ-SCHEMA-1

Tool "remove_account" describes a credential store (SSH keys, cloud credentials, a keychain or an equivalent) that nothing in its input schema can address. A tool's interface is the honest statement of what it touches; prose that reaches past it is addressed to the model, not to a reader.

Evidence: Keychain

Fix: Remove the reference, or expose the target as an explicit, validated parameter so the client can see and consent to what the tool reads.

Location: tool remove_account · description

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (setup.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`setup.js:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from 'child_process'; import { readFileSync, writeFileSync, existsSync } from 'fs'; import { homedir,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server setup.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (tools/accounts.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tools/accounts.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from 'child_process'; import { dirname, join } from 'path'; import { fileURLToPath } from 'url'; impor

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tools/accounts.js

Tools 46

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_emails_with_previewingests untrusted input
  • get_threadingests untrusted input
  • read_attachmentingests untrusted input
  • read_emailsingests untrusted input
  • send_emailnetwork egress
  • unified_inboxingests untrusted input
  • add_accountno sensitive capability
  • add_ruleno sensitive capability
  • apply_rulesno sensitive capability
  • bulk_deleteno sensitive capability
Show 36 more tools ↓
  • bulk_mark_readno sensitive capability
  • bulk_mark_unreadno sensitive capability
  • bulk_moveno sensitive capability
  • cancel_scheduledno sensitive capability
  • check_connectionno sensitive capability
  • check_email_opensno sensitive capability
  • complete_reminderno sensitive capability
  • delete_draftno sensitive capability
  • delete_emailno sensitive capability
  • export_emailno sensitive capability
  • extract_calendar_eventsno sensitive capability
  • get_attachmentsno sensitive capability
  • get_contact_historyno sensitive capability
  • get_email_bodyno sensitive capability
  • list_accountsno sensitive capability
  • list_draftsno sensitive capability
  • list_foldersno sensitive capability
  • list_remindersno sensitive capability
  • list_rulesno sensitive capability
  • list_scheduledno sensitive capability
  • list_tracked_emailsno sensitive capability
  • mark_as_readno sensitive capability
  • mark_as_unreadno sensitive capability
  • move_emailno sensitive capability
  • open_setupno sensitive capability
  • remove_accountno sensitive capability
  • remove_all_accountsno sensitive capability
  • remove_ruleno sensitive capability
  • reply_to_emailno sensitive capability
  • save_draftno sensitive capability
  • schedule_emailno sensitive capability
  • search_emailsno sensitive capability
  • send_draftno sensitive capability
  • set_reminderno sensitive capability
  • switch_accountno sensitive capability
  • unsubscribe_emailno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.6.1 latest B 87/100 5 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 87/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mailbridge-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mailbridge-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mailbridge-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mailbridge-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mailbridge-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mailbridge-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Web, Search & Scraping