Notebooklm (m4ykeldev) MCP Server
@m4ykeldev/notebooklm-mcp
npm
v0.3.1
Source verified
Published by m4yk3ldev — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.
MCP server for Google NotebookLM — 32 tools for notebooks, sources, research, and studio content generation
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −6.3 | Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 | injection |
2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 6 = 88. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 3
high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli.js)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.js:191`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import { createInterface } from "readline"; var CONFIG_DIR = join(homedir(), ".n
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli.js
medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/cli.js)MTC-SRC-003
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.js:456`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const response = await fetch(`http://${CDP_HOST}:${port}/json/list`); if (response.ok) { const data = awa
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli.js
medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/cli.js)MTC-SRC-009
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.js:339`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rm === "linux") { execSync(`xdg-open "${url}"`, { stdio: "ignore" }); } else if (platform === "darwin") {
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli.js
What this scan could not see
- No tools were enumerated, so prompt-injection, capability and toxic-flow analysis had no tool surface to inspect. To grade a package’s real runtime tools, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.3.1 latest |
B 88/100 | 3 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @m4ykeldev/notebooklm-mcp --onlineOther implementations of Notebooklm 7
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 8 side by side →
MCP server for Google NotebookLM — chat, source ingestion, audio overviews, citations, stdio + Streamable-HTTP transports.
FastMCP v2 server for NotebookLM automation with modern async support
MCP server for Google NotebookLM
Security-hardened MCP server for NotebookLM API with compliance-ready architecture (GDPR, SOC2, CSSF controls implemented)
Node.js Model Context Protocol server for Google NotebookLM
MCP server for NotebookLM (notebooklm.google.com)
More in Data Science & ML
MCP server for 2s.io — 575+ pay-per-call tools for AI agents — ground-truth data, AI gateway, and agent infra (storage, locks, queues, watchers). x402 USDC on Base/Solana, no API keys, upto usage billing, free trials.
ArXiv preprints + Google Scholar papers, with citation counts in one query.
Add MCP servers to your favorite coding agents with a single command.
Help agents automatically write and test stories for your UI components
Model Context Protocol server for AI-Archive platform - enables AI agents to discover, submit, and review research papers
MCP server for Semantic Scholar research workflows with stdio and Streamable HTTP transports.