@lyalindotcom/nano-banana-mcp
npm
v1.0.10
Published by @lyalindotcom — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
MCP server for Gemini Flash 2.5 image generation with CLI tools
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/index.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: import { spawn } from 'child_process'; import fs from 'fs-extra'; import path from 'path'; import { fileURLToPath } fro
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/index.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/lib/utils.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from 'child_process'; import axios from 'axios'; import ora from 'ora'; /** * Find the Nano Banana MC
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/lib/utils.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/lib/utils.js:32`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const response = await axios.post(`https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemini-pro:generateContent?k
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/lib/utils.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
adjust_imageno sensitive capabilitybatch_processno sensitive capabilitycombine_imagesno sensitive capabilitycomposite_imagesno sensitive capabilitygenerate_imageno sensitive capabilityinspect_transparencyno sensitive capabilitymake_transparentno sensitive capabilitytransform_imageno sensitive capabilityvalidate_imageno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.10 latest |
A 92/100 | 3 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @lyalindotcom/nano-banana-mcp --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 10 side by side →
MCP server for Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Image generation API with cross-platform support
MCP server for Nanana AI nano banana image generation service
MCP server for AI image generation, editing, and video generation powered by Google Gemini and Veo
MCP server for Google Nano Banana (Gemini) image generation
Standalone MCP server for generating and editing images with Google Gemini
MCP server for Gemini image generation and editing (Nano Banana, Interactions API)
Turn designs into shipped parts: quote 3D printing, CNC, and decals, then check out.
Aleph's official SiliconFlow media-generation MCP server (image / video / TTS)
MCP server for image generation using Google Gemini AI
Ambience AI MCP Server - Generate images, videos, and audio through Model Context Protocol
MCP server exposing every endpoint of the AstroWay Calculation API as tools — natal, synastry, transits, Vedic dashas, Tarot, Numerology, Human Design, AI horoscopes — for Claude Desktop, Cursor and any MCP-compatible AI agent.
Audio-guide and trip-planning tools for 1,100+ cities from Audiala. Free, no API key.