Lumina MCP Server

lumina-mcp npm v1.4.1

Published by wahyu-labs — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Unified MCP toolkit for engineering workflows, database connections, and source control

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:287`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: br,execFile as Tr}from"child_process";import{promisify as je}from"util";var Ue=je(br),ge=je(Tr);async function He(n,e,t

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/index.js

Tools 32

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • analyze_mysql_queryreads sensitive data
  • analyze_postgresql_queryreads sensitive data
  • execute_mysql_queryreads sensitive data
  • execute_postgres_queryreads sensitive data
  • fix_gitea_pr_reviewingests untrusted input
  • fix_github_pr_reviewingests untrusted input
  • get_gitea_pr_diffingests untrusted input
  • get_github_issueingests untrusted input
  • get_github_pr_diffingests untrusted input
  • get_jira_ticketingests untrusted input
Show 22 more tools ↓
  • get_jira_ticket_commentsingests untrusted input
  • get_openproject_work_packageingests untrusted input
  • get_openproject_work_package_commentsingests untrusted input
  • get_trello_cardingests untrusted input
  • create_gitea_prno sensitive capability
  • create_github_issueno sensitive capability
  • create_github_prno sensitive capability
  • create_jira_ticketno sensitive capability
  • create_openproject_work_packageno sensitive capability
  • create_trello_cardno sensitive capability
  • generate_commit_and_pushno sensitive capability
  • get_orchestration_phaseno sensitive capability
  • inspect_mysql_tableno sensitive capability
  • inspect_postgresql_tableno sensitive capability
  • list_mysql_tablesno sensitive capability
  • list_postgresql_tablesno sensitive capability
  • reply_to_pr_commentno sensitive capability
  • resolve_pr_review_threadno sensitive capability
  • review_gitea_prno sensitive capability
  • review_github_prno sensitive capability
  • save_audit_reportno sensitive capability
  • save_audit_report_pgno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.4.1 latest A 93/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v1.4.0 A 93/100 1 1.12.1 2026-08-01
v1.3.2 A 93/100 1 1.12.1 2026-07-28

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/lumina-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/lumina-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/lumina-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/lumina-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/lumina-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan lumina-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Databases