Levh MCP Server

levh PyPI v2.27.2

Published by ali-ulu — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Local-first memory layer for AI agents and humans

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

high Shell/command execution in server code (cli.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`cli.py:507`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: top = subprocess.run( ["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"], capture_outpu

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server cli.py

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (dashboard/_next/static/chunks/main-6231b573fad16866.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`dashboard/_next/static/chunks/main-6231b573fad16866.js:1`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: bitArray:this.bitArray}}import(e){this.numItems=e.numItems,this.errorRate=e.errorRate,this.numBits=e.numBits,this.numHas

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dashboard/_next/static/chunks/main-6231b573fad16866.js

Tools 59

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • about_entityno sensitive capability
  • about_organizationno sensitive capability
  • about_personno sensitive capability
  • admit_memoryno sensitive capability
  • ask_memoryno sensitive capability
  • audit_secretsno sensitive capability
  • briefingno sensitive capability
  • clear_short_termno sensitive capability
  • connector_sync_statusno sensitive capability
  • consolidate_memoriesno sensitive capability
Show 49 more tools ↓
  • consolidate_similarno sensitive capability
  • create_backupno sensitive capability
  • create_sessionno sensitive capability
  • dedupe_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • detect_conflict_candidatesno sensitive capability
  • end_sessionno sensitive capability
  • evaluate_admissionno sensitive capability
  • export_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • forget_memoryno sensitive capability
  • generate_context_fileno sensitive capability
  • get_connector_helpno sensitive capability
  • get_contextno sensitive capability
  • get_memory_statsno sensitive capability
  • import_from_appno sensitive capability
  • import_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_conflict_candidatesno sensitive capability
  • list_connectorsno sensitive capability
  • list_decisionsno sensitive capability
  • list_entitiesno sensitive capability
  • list_fading_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_low_trust_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_organizationsno sensitive capability
  • list_peopleno sensitive capability
  • list_projectsno sensitive capability
  • list_review_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_sourcesno sensitive capability
  • meeting_prepno sensitive capability
  • memory_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • memory_trustno sensitive capability
  • pin_memoryno sensitive capability
  • purge_memoryno sensitive capability
  • recall_memoryno sensitive capability
  • recompute_trust_scoresno sensitive capability
  • redact_secretsno sensitive capability
  • reindex_entitiesno sensitive capability
  • reinforce_memoryno sensitive capability
  • related_memoriesno sensitive capability
  • restore_backupno sensitive capability
  • review_conflict_candidateno sensitive capability
  • review_memoryno sensitive capability
  • search_memoryno sensitive capability
  • set_importanceno sensitive capability
  • store_memoryno sensitive capability
  • summarize_sessionno sensitive capability
  • sync_connectorno sensitive capability
  • timelineno sensitive capability
  • unpin_memoryno sensitive capability
  • update_memoryno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.27.2 latest A 93/100 2 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/levh/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/levh)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/levh"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/levh/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/levh/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan levh --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools