Confluence Data Center MCP Server

@leilashellroot/confluence-data-center-mcp npm v1.0.1 Source verified

Published by leilashellroot — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Trust grade
A
90/100
Last scanned
Trust
A · 90/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 90/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 10 = 90. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
publisher verification (provenance) — cryptographic build provenance ties the artifact to its source
inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/config.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/config.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child_process

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/config.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([confluence_get_all_comments]) co-exist with external-action tools ([confluence_create_comment]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [confluence_get_all_comments] → sinks [confluence_create_comment]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow confluence_get_all_comments → confluence_create_comment

Tools 50

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • confluence_create_commentnetwork egress
  • confluence_get_all_commentsingests untrusted input
  • confluence_add_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_add_labelsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_archive_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_create_contentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_create_content_propertyno sensitive capability
  • confluence_create_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_createContentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_delete_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_delete_commentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_delete_contentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_delete_content_propertyno sensitive capability
  • confluence_delete_content_versionno sensitive capability
  • confluence_delete_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_attachmentsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_childrenno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_commentsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_contentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_content_contextno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_content_propertiesno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_content_propertyno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_content_versionno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_current_userno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_descendantsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_historyno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_labelsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_restrictionsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_space_contentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_spacesno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_userno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_usersno sensitive capability
  • confluence_get_watchersno sensitive capability
  • confluence_getContentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_remove_labelno sensitive capability
  • confluence_scan_contentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_search_contentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_search_spacesno sensitive capability
  • confluence_searchContentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_searchSpaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_attachment_datano sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_commentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_contentno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_content_propertyno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_restrictionsno sensitive capability
  • confluence_update_spaceno sensitive capability
  • confluence_updateContentno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.1 latest A 90/100 2 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 90/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/leilashellroot-confluence-data-center-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/leilashellroot-confluence-data-center-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/leilashellroot-confluence-data-center-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/leilashellroot-confluence-data-center-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/leilashellroot-confluence-data-center-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @leilashellroot/confluence-data-center-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools