legion-mcp
PyPI
v0.1.5
Published by wearethelegion — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`src/legion_mcp/proxy/cognitive_extractor.py:494`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: process = subprocess.Popen( cmd, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, st
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/legion_mcp/proxy/cognitive_extractor.py
In the server's implementation (`src/legion_mcp/proxy_manager.py:122`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["lsof", "-ti", f":{port}"], capture_output=True, text=T
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/legion_mcp/proxy_manager.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`src/legion_mcp/tools/delegation.py:919`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ) process = subprocess.Popen( cmd, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, st
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/legion_mcp/tools/delegation.py
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
activateWorkflowingests untrusted inputaddEntryno sensitive capabilityaddExpertiseChunkno sensitive capabilityassignTaskno sensitive capabilityauthenticateUserno sensitive capabilitycancel_delegationno sensitive capabilitycompleteTaskno sensitive capabilitycreateAgentno sensitive capabilitycreateCodeno sensitive capabilitycreateEngagementno sensitive capabilitycreateExpertiseno sensitive capabilitycreateKnowledgeno sensitive capabilitycreateTaskno sensitive capabilitycreateWorkflowno sensitive capabilitydelegate_to_agentno sensitive capabilitydeleteAgentno sensitive capabilitydeleteWorkflowno sensitive capabilityget_delegation_resultno sensitive capabilityget_delegation_statusno sensitive capabilitygetEngagementno sensitive capabilitygetEntryno sensitive capabilitygetExpertiseno sensitive capabilitygetIngestionStatusno sensitive capabilitygetProjectsno sensitive capabilitygetTaskno sensitive capabilitylinkAgentSkillno sensitive capabilitylinkArtifactno sensitive capabilitylist_delegationsno sensitive capabilitylistEngagementsno sensitive capabilitylistExpertiseno sensitive capabilitylistIngestionsno sensitive capabilitylistTasksno sensitive capabilitylistWorkflowsno sensitive capabilityproxy_statusno sensitive capabilityrecordLessonno sensitive capabilityresumeEngagementno sensitive capabilitysearchEntriesno sensitive capabilitystart_proxyno sensitive capabilitystop_proxyno sensitive capabilityunlinkAgentSkillno sensitive capabilityupdateAgentno sensitive capabilityupdateEngagementno sensitive capabilityupdateEntryno sensitive capabilityupdateExpertiseno sensitive capabilityupdateTaskno sensitive capabilityupdateWorkflowno sensitive capabilitywhatIKnowno sensitive capabilitywhoAmIno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.5 latest |
A 93/100 | 3 | 1.8.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan legion-mcp --online --registry pypi
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.